Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision · Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6

Effect
Objection passed
Result
442 for · 184 against · 12 abstained roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:48
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the objection
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0380
Dossier
2026/2783(RSP)
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheries Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call)
Sitting
Wednesday 16 September 2026
Final vote
196493
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 442 for, 184 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Objection passed by a large majority.

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 11Abst. 2No vote 8 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 33Against 30Abst. 4No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
EPPFor 40Against 114Abst. 4No vote 26 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
ECRFor 60Against 14Abst. 1No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 57Against 14Abst. 1No vote 12 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 26Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Voted against their group, 87

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria155000.63
Belgium1010020.25
Bulgaria103130.57
Cyprus5100—
Czechia312060.70
Germany51320120.42
Denmark58020.42
Estonia2221—
Spain3028020.28
Finland75030.38
France731070.98
Greece200011.00
Croatia100110.86
Hungary160041.00
Ireland6206—
Italy579190.78
Lithuania53210.25
Luxembourg4200—
Latvia7101—
Malta3201—
Netherlands2110000.52
Poland3111380.53
Portugal107220.29
Romania818070.54
Sweden1011000.29
Slovenia8100—
Slovakia150001.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches116 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution B10-0380/2026 – Motion for a resolution Roll call442 for, 184 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left

Roll call requested by The Left.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0380

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The text concerns a draft Commission decision to allow products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 onto the market under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

Parliament adopted the resolution as its official position, objecting to that draft authorisation.

Parliament points to scientific uncertainties, gaps in the risk assessment and the lack of a qualified majority among member states, and has repeatedly said the Commission should not authorise such products in those circumstances.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's resolution objects to a draft Commission implementing decision that would authorise imports of food, food ingredients and feed containing genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2783(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) of the Rules of procedure on authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council - D115873

Parliament adopted the text on 16 September 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 16 September 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ENVI · Authors: Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN (EPP), Biljana BORZAN (S&D), Martin HÄUSLING (Greens), Anja HAZEKAMP (The Left)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 13 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/12
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6”. Decision, 16 September 2026. votingId 196493, document B-10-2026-0380, reference 2026/2783(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/12 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-09-16-12,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/12}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/12},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 196493, document B-10-2026-0380, reference 2026/2783(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}