Skip to content

Member

Estelle CEULEMANS

S&D · Belgium

Group
S&D
Country
Belgium
Roll-call participation
94.0 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
85.5 %ⓘ of 5 572 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %
More facts (5)
National party
PS Parti Socialiste
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
752 of 5 475 votesⓘ
Committees
EMPL, ENVI (substitute), SANT (substitute)
Member id
256880
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.0 %

5 574 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (+4.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

85.5 %

4 762 of 5 572 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (−10.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

13.7 %

752 of 5 475 votes where their group had a clear line

560 opposite (for ↔ against), 143 abstained against the line, 49 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.3 %

185 of 5 574 votes cast

Participation 94.0 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Estelle CEULEMANS94.0 %
S&D median89.9 %
Lowest in the group30.4 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members138
With majority line 85.5 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Estelle CEULEMANS85.5 %
S&D median96.3 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members138
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242316
18 Jul 202410
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249292
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129129
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202420
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241312
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244543
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254542
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228227
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251248
3 Apr 20256260
5 May 202554
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220217
8 May 2025103100
21 May 202520
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259189
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134133
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101100
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186182
23 Oct 20255553
13 Nov 2025267267
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125123
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256664
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254240
20 Jan 20266766
21 Jan 2026112112
22 Jan 20265858
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141141
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197194
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 2026340
25 Mar 202632
26 Mar 20266968
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 20262250
29 Apr 2026296293
30 Apr 20266867
18 May 202643
19 May 202632
20 May 20269693
21 May 20269898
15 Jun 202621
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127124
18 Jun 20267776
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267269
8 Jul 2026144141
9 Jul 20266766
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155153
16 Sept 20268072
17 Sept 2026124124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elio DI RUPO S&DBelgium91 % of 5 000 shared93 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance89 % of 3 921 shared93 %
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 364 shared93 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 961 shared93 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance88 % of 5 076 shared93 %
Jean-Marc GERMAIN S&DFrance88 % of 4 945 shared93 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance88 % of 5 397 shared93 %
Eric SARGIACOMO S&DFrance88 % of 5 193 shared93 %
Nora MEBAREK S&DFrance88 % of 4 996 shared93 %
Pierre JOUVET S&DFrance87 % of 4 740 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Mélissa CAMARA GreensFrance88 % of 4 814 shared83 %
Saskia BRICMONT GreensBelgium88 % of 5 171 shared83 %
David CORMAND GreensFrance88 % of 5 375 shared83 %
Marie TOUSSAINT GreensFrance87 % of 5 205 shared83 %
Tilly METZ GreensLuxembourg87 % of 5 362 shared83 %
Mounir SATOURI GreensFrance87 % of 5 128 shared83 %
Gordan BOSANAC GreensCroatia87 % of 5 472 shared83 %
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia87 % of 4 791 shared83 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland87 % of 4 718 shared83 %
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium87 % of 4 851 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working groupMember14 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working groupMember24 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 17 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL16 Mar 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activitiesOpinion rapporteurEMPL21 Jan 2026
No dossier namedRapporteurEMPL21 Jan 2026
Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provisionOpinion rapporteurEMPL21 Jan 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL6 Jan 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL4 Sept 2025
An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sectorShadow rapporteurEMPL10 Jun 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/691 as regards support to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuringShadow rapporteurEMPL4 Jun 2025
Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentShadow rapporteurEMPL3 Jun 2025
Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsShadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL13 May 2025

Show all 11 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

45 contributions recorded; 10 on behalf of their group; 68 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 76

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
7 Sept 2026Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Jul 2026European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822Written questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
30 Jun 2026Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698Written questionwith 43 co-authors18 Sept 2026
8 Jun 2026Access to Temporary Protection Directive provisions in Belgium for babies born after 24 February 2022 E-10-2026-002349Written questionwith 6 co-authors31 Aug 2026
2 Jun 2026Application of the Early Detection and Exclusion System to companies active in the cyber-surveillance sector, including those involved in spyware E-10-2026-002239Written questionwith 30 co-authors5 Aug 2026
2 Jun 2026Participation of EU officials in ISS World Europe security fair E-10-2026-002240Written questionwith 29 co-authors21 Sept 2026
13 May 2026Another shooting attack by Libyan militias on the humanitarian vessel Sea-Watch 5 E-10-2026-002019Written questionwith 31 co-authors10 Aug 2026
17 Apr 2026Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019Oral questionwith 53 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Apr 2026Conditionality of public aid in the European steel sector E-10-2026-001535Written question22 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026The offshoring and industrial strategy of ArcelorMittal in Europe E-10-2026-001537Written question1 Jul 2026
15 Apr 2026Respect for workers’ right to be informed and consulted E-10-2026-001538Written question1 Jul 2026
15 Apr 2026Protecting the European steel market from international distortions E-10-2026-001539Written question10 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026Consistency between EU climate policies and industrial strategies E-10-2026-001540Written question22 Jun 2026
13 Apr 2026Executive order by the Trump administration against Cuba and human rights E-10-2026-001489Written questionwith 20 co-authors23 Jul 2026
12 Mar 2026Belgian bank guarantee in favour of Girteka and compliance with EU rules on competition and social dumping E-10-2026-001051Written questionwith 1 co-author18 May 2026
9 Mar 2026Public procurement and deaths at work: choosing the best bidder in social terms and making social rights and safety at work a condition for access to contracts O-10-2026-000011Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
4 Mar 2026Privacy risks and GDPR compliance issues linked to Meta’s smart glasses and AI training practices P-10-2026-000903Priority written questionwith 34 co-authors1 Apr 2026
25 Feb 2026Asbestos in sand and play products for children – health risks and European market surveillance E-10-2026-000785Written questionNot yet answered
6 Feb 2026The case of Vincenzo Fullone and violations of human rights by Israeli authorities E-10-2026-000496Written questionwith 33 co-authors13 Apr 2026
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026
28 Jan 2026Addressing the gender health gap in the new research and innovation programme (FP10) O-10-2026-000004Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Jan 2026EU response to recent US statements concerning Colombia, Mexico, Cuba and Greenland, and respect for international law and treaties E-10-2026-000146Written questionwith 23 co-authors16 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
9 Dec 2025Participation of Israel in the Horizon Europe programme E-10-2025-004869Written questionwith 43 co-authors7 Apr 2026
25 Nov 2025The situation in Sudan and the ongoing negotiations with the United Arab Emirates E-10-2025-004685Written questionwith 22 co-authors26 Feb 2026
20 Nov 2025European digital sovereignty and the drafting process of the ‘Digital Omnibus’ E-10-2025-004632Written questionwith 30 co-authors16 Feb 2026
12 Nov 2025Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Jan 2026
5 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore B-10-2025-0479Motion for a resolutionwith 75 co-authors—
22 Oct 2025The ongoing disinformation campaign targeting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees in the Near East and the EU’s support to the agency E-10-2025-004158Written questionwith 41 co-authors25 Mar 2026
13 Oct 2025Letter regarding the announcement by the Dutch Government to postpone the transposition of the Pay Transparency Directive to 2027 E-10-2025-004018Written questionwith 28 co-authors18 Dec 2025
3 Oct 2025Conflict of interest and regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) P-10-2025-003902Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors21 Jan 2026
23 Sept 2025How will the Commission improve transparency in the next Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (NDICI-GE) regulation? E-10-2025-003691Written questionwith 16 co-authors21 Jan 2026
19 Sept 2025Suspension of the EU-Qatar agreement on air transport O-10-2025-000031Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
9 Sept 2025Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482Written questionwith 108 co-authors4 Nov 2025
4 Aug 2025Strengthening the role of local and regional authorities in upholding the rule of law in the EU E-10-2025-003175Written questionwith 27 co-authors2 Oct 2025
24 Jul 2025Israel’s detention of Palestinians and the EU’s role in potential violations of international law E-10-2025-003071Written questionwith 36 co-authors8 Sept 2025
16 Jul 2025Incitement to hate and violence based on racism and xenophobia in Torre Pacheco (Spain) by far right groups E-10-2025-002923Written questionwith 18 co-authors24 Sept 2025
16 Jul 2025Concerns over Israeli online campaigns and enforcement of DSA obligations E-10-2025-002936Written questionwith 31 co-authors12 Sept 2025
8 Jul 2025Health access in Gaza and a corridor from Gaza to East Jerusalem hospitals E-10-2025-002776Written questionwith 28 co-authors9 Oct 2025
30 Jun 2025Leaked internal note regarding Israeli war crimes and violations of human rights E-10-2025-002628Written questionwith 20 co-authors18 Sept 2025
27 Jun 2025Working conditions of doctors in Europe E-10-2025-002607Written questionwith 17 co-authors14 Aug 2025
27 Jun 2025New studies confirming carcinogenic effects of long-term exposure to glyphosate at relevant levels E-10-2025-002611Written questionwith 31 co-authorsNot yet answered
26 Jun 2025Reported environmental and human rights abuses of EU steel companies in non-EU countries and the need to uphold the CSDDD’s objective E-10-2025-002596Written questionwith 26 co-authors11 Aug 2025
2 Jun 2025Access for humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip E-10-2025-002193Written questionwith 21 co-authors4 Aug 2025
27 May 2025Israel’s intention to take full control of the Gaza strip and remove the Palestinian population from the area – EU’s actions and reactions E-10-2025-002127Written questionwith 24 co-authors1 Aug 2025
19 May 2025Emissions trading system and carbon border adjustment mechanism – DRI steel loophole E-10-2025-001999Written questionwith 19 co-authors1 Aug 2025
16 May 2025Urgent action required for the immediate closure of the Italian migrant detention centre in Trapani E-10-2025-001971Written questionwith 20 co-authors15 Sept 2025
15 May 2025The slaughter of marine mammals in the Faroe Islands E-10-2025-001959Written questionwith 13 co-authors8 Jul 2025
14 May 2025Israel’s demolitions in Masafer Yatta E-10-2025-001952Written questionwith 28 co-authors1 Aug 2025
7 May 2025Bridgestone’s restructuring plan for its plants in the Basque Country and Cantabria E-10-2025-001853Written questionwith 5 co-authors14 Jul 2025
24 Apr 2025Enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA) E-10-2025-001646Written questionwith 12 co-authors22 Jul 2025
23 Apr 2025Acquisition of X by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI E-10-2025-001615Written questionwith 42 co-authors14 Jul 2025
8 Apr 2025The situation of truck drivers in Europe who come from countries outside the EU E-10-2025-001423Written questionwith 5 co-authors17 Jul 2025
8 Apr 2025Truck drivers on strike in Venlo, the Netherlands E-10-2025-001422Written questionwith 5 co-authors2 Jun 2025
8 Apr 2025Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) – extreme morning sickness and debilitating pregnancy disease E-10-2025-001420Written questionwith 9 co-authors2 Jul 2025
19 Mar 2025Withdrawal of the Equal Treatment Directive E-10-2025-001151Written question11 Jun 2025
12 Mar 2025Period poverty in the EU: actions by the Commission E-10-2025-001082Written questionwith 40 co-authors13 Jun 2025
12 Mar 2025Menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2025-001083Written questionwith 38 co-authors16 Jun 2025
6 Mar 2025Urgent measures for sea rescue E-10-2025-000979Written questionwith 28 co-authors19 Jun 2025
3 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights B-10-2025-0143Motion for a resolution—
28 Feb 2025Action plan on rare diseases E-10-2025-000886Written questionwith 33 co-authors26 Jun 2025
12 Feb 2025The Commission’s recent statement on the 28th regime and labour law E-10-2025-000673Written questionwith 8 co-authors11 Jun 2025
11 Feb 2025The use of Paragon Solutions spyware against journalists E-10-2025-000617Written questionwith 23 co-authors11 Jun 2025
11 Feb 2025Trump declarations on Gaza and the Palestinian people E-10-2025-000612Written questionwith 55 co-authors3 Apr 2025
10 Feb 2025Use of Paragon Solutions spyware against journalists and civil society representatives E-10-2025-000600Written questionwith 14 co-authors11 Apr 2025
30 Jan 2025Meta’s recent decision to end fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp in the United States E-10-2025-000423Written questionwith 31 co-authors31 Mar 2025
13 Dec 2024Mercury levels in tuna and their potential risks to public health E-10-2024-002929Written questionwith 5 co-authors4 Mar 2025
9 Dec 2024The spread of disinformation by recommender systems and other automated mechanisms as a systemic risk under the Digital Services Act E-10-2024-002826Written questionwith 39 co-authors19 Feb 2025
5 Dec 2024The role of TikTok in the Romanian presidential election E-10-2024-002794Written questionwith 36 co-authors11 Feb 2025
28 Nov 2024Blatant disregard of International Criminal Court decisions by the Hungarian Prime Minister E-10-2024-002697Written questionwith 45 co-authors6 Feb 2025
11 Nov 2024Continued availability of operating grants under the 2025 EU4Health work programme E-10-2024-002488Written questionwith 28 co-authors20 Jan 2025
17 Oct 2024Launch of European humanitarian corridors from Lebanon to the EU E-10-2024-002127Written questionwith 55 co-authors12 Feb 2025
15 Oct 2024The CJEU judgment and the ‘return of vehicles’ provision in the Mobility Package E-10-2024-002082Written questionwith 1 co-author9 Jan 2025
24 Sept 2024Human rights violations by EU-funded forces in Tunisia E-10-2024-001795Written questionwith 48 co-authors12 Mar 2025
19 Aug 2024Restructuring at Audi in Brussels E-10-2024-001518Written questionwith 3 co-authors31 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 82

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
2 Sept 2026Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-792013 EMPL35
13 Jul 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections EMPL-AM-789962 EMPL15
22 Jun 2026Boosting skills in the Union – opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition EMPL-AM-790034 EMPL21
22 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1238 on a pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) EMPL-AM-788963 EMPL42
19 May 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 EMPL-AM-788901 EMPL43
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788891 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788905 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE3
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788900 ITRE4

Show all 82 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Belgium National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Estelle CEULEMANS”. Member record. memberId 256880. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256880?docs=all&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256880. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256880?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256880,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Estelle CEULEMANS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256880?docs=all&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256880?docs=all&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256880. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256880. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}