Skip to content

Member

Pascale PIERA

Patriots · France

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
France
Roll-call participation
86.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
93.3 %ⓘ of 537 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 80.0 %
More facts (5)
National party
RN Rassemblement national
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
3 of 424 votesⓘ
Committees
JURI, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
256877
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

86.8 %

538 of 620 final votes while in office

Patriots median: 90.8 % (−4.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.3 %

501 of 537 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 80.0 % (+13.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

3 of 424 votes where their group had a clear line

0 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

12.5 %

67 of 538 votes cast

Participation 86.8 % — Patriots median 90.8 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Pascale PIERA86.8 %
Patriots median90.8 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members89
With majority line 93.3 % — Patriots median 80.0 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Pascale PIERA93.3 %
Patriots median80.0 %
Lowest in the group59.5 %
Highest in the group94.8 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 138 for, 468 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 2 — part 2 461 for, 130 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 128 for, 469 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 248 for, 294 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 1 — part 2 478 for, 117 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 134 for, 436 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 2 413 for, 143 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 1 575 for, 13 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 2 403 for, 146 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 1 449 for, 100 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 63 — part 3 401 for, 181 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55 197 for, 400 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29 189 for, 387 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Separate vote on paragraph 17 487 for, 45 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Tie
17 Sept 2026Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 373 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 145 for, 417 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 153 for, 424 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Separate vote on paragraph 3 517 for, 8 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified maize MON 87460 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 433 for, 159 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94313 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 457 for, 184 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 442 for, 184 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 19 359 for, 210 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 9 353 for, 204 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 2 311 for, 309 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 1 466 for, 128 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AB 354 for, 205 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AA 362 for, 208 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital Z 431 for, 165 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 2 335 for, 279 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 1 509 for, 115 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital D 593 for, 37 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 2 411 for, 213 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 1 395 for, 179 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 3 351 for, 272 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 2 429 for, 153 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 1 460 for, 129 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 3 325 for, 296 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 2 446 for, 138 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 1 450 for, 168 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 60 386 for, 230 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 3 322 for, 313 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 2 409 for, 150 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 1 510 for, 78 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jean-Paul GARRAUD PatriotsFrance100 % of 4 668 shared74 %
Julien LEONARDELLI PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 749 shared74 %
Séverine WERBROUCK PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 604 shared74 %
Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN PatriotsFrance99 % of 5 123 shared74 %
Fabrice LEGGERI PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 940 shared74 %
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 853 shared74 %
Valérie DELOGE PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 984 shared74 %
Aleksandar NIKOLIC PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 594 shared74 %
Marie DAUCHY PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 099 shared74 %
Julien SANCHEZ PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 857 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance78 % of 4 344 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance78 % of 4 030 shared70 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance77 % of 4 895 shared68 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance76 % of 4 555 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 4 288 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania74 % of 4 164 shared51 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany71 % of 3 873 shared68 %
Galato ALEXANDRAKI ECRGreece71 % of 3 283 shared68 %
René AUST ESNGermany71 % of 4 647 shared70 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany71 % of 3 752 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Arab PeninsulaDARP DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblySubstitute12 Dec 2024now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working groupMember20 Feb 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember19 Jul 202426 Apr 2026

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

24 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 29 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
8 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 2 minRead
16 Dec 2025Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
25 Nov 2025Communication on the European Democracy Shield (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Oct 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements (A10-0197/2025 - Jörgen Warborn) (vote) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Sept 2025Need for a strong European Democracy Shield to enhance democracy, protect the EU from foreign interference and hybrid threats, and protect electoral processes in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025State of play of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act in the Member States (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025State of play of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act in the Member States (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 24 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 86

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026The 28th regime/EU Inc.: can the Commission guarantee the soundness of its legal basis? P-10-2026-003589Priority written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Jul 2026Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Jun 2026Jean Monnet Actions European funding of universities and promotion of the federalist project E-10-2026-002346Written questionwith 8 co-authors24 Jul 2026
28 Apr 2026War in the Strait of Hormuz: measures to shield European agriculture from rising fertiliser prices O-10-2026-000022Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
25 Mar 2026Bringing balance to the infringement procedures launched by the Commission concerning decisions to take opposition media off the air E-10-2026-001250Written questionwith 3 co-authors1 Jun 2026
25 Mar 2026Restoring genuine academic freedom in our universities E-10-2026-001262Written questionwith 27 co-authors22 May 2026
18 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation amending Annex III to Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential B-10-2026-0178Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—
26 Feb 2026Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU list of terrorist organisations O-10-2026-000009Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
23 Feb 2026Agreement between the European Union and Australia: what are the consequences for the EU’s livestock sectors? E-10-2026-000737Written questionwith 8 co-authors24 Apr 2026
27 Jan 2026Access to mental health care in the outermost regions E-10-2026-000321Written questionwith 8 co-authors25 Mar 2026

Show all 86 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 66

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI40
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI36
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI38
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI30
29 Jun 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) JURI-AM-790236 JURI11
25 Jun 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 as regards amendments adopted by the Assembly of the Lisbon Union on 14 July 2025 to the Common Regulations under the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications JURI-AM-790209 JURI13
19 May 2026Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693 CJ03-AM-788926 CJ0343
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787835 CJ0536
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787836 CJ0518
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787837 CJ0549

Show all 66 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Pascale PIERA”. Member record. memberId 256877. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256877?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256877. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256877?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256877,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Pascale PIERA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256877?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256877?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256877. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256877. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}