Skip to content

Member · Former member

Zoltán TARR

EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
38.9 %ⓘ of 4 836 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
83.1 %ⓘ of 1 882 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 8 May 2026 (left on 8 May 2026)
Against clear line
250 of 1 798 votesⓘ
Member id
256863
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

38.9 %

1 882 of 4 836 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (−51.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

83.1 %

1 564 of 1 882 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (−10.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

13.9 %

250 of 1 798 votes where their group had a clear line

126 opposite (for ↔ against), 123 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

8.7 %

163 of 1 882 votes cast

Participation 38.9 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Zoltán TARR38.9 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 83.1 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Zoltán TARR83.1 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 836

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 20 528 for, 61 against, 85 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 149 to paragraph 4, indent 20 187 for, 469 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 147 to paragraph 4, after indent 8 172 for, 445 against, 22 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 8 664 for, 5 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Paragraph 4, indent 7 — part 2 282 for, 340 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 145 to paragraph 4, indent 7 192 for, 448 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 27 to paragraph 4, after indent 6 548 for, 60 against, 64 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Amendment 14 to paragraph 1 197 for, 463 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Final votePassed 377 for, 279 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 24 to recital 23 208 for, 465 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 29, adding text after recital 4 184 for, 479 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 28, adding text after recital 2 125 for, 536 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 27 to Article 6, paragraph 1, after point e 205 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 26 to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 205 for, 460 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 8 432 for, 202 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 605 for, 68 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement: cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 619 for, 9 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 192 for, 446 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 518 for, 104 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Agreements on Financial Mechanisms for the period May 2021 - April 2028 (EEA: EU-Iceland-Liechtenstein-Norway; Norwegian: EU-Norway); Additional Protocols to EEC-Norway Agreement and to EEC-Iceland Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 528 for, 121 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 441 for, 173 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 42 181 for, 477 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 41 216 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 28 to paragraph 39 198 for, 434 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 36 115 for, 485 against, 85 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 34 187 for, 469 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 33 149 for, 486 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 32 179 for, 490 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 31 90 for, 579 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Paragraph 31 — part 3 497 for, 135 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 28 130 for, 505 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 28 132 for, 474 against, 59 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 44 to paragraph 28 97 for, 525 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 43 to paragraph 27 96 for, 484 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 195 for, 468 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 193 for, 472 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 26 186 for, 484 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 191 for, 472 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 25 118 for, 522 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 137 for, 478 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 143 for, 478 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 25 309 for, 304 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 24 182 for, 466 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 24 184 for, 412 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 22 118 for, 549 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 22 125 for, 524 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 82, adding text after paragraph 22 145 for, 529 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 326 for, 315 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 337 for, 311 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 252 for, 381 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 42 of 91 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary98 % of 1 649 shared89 %
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary98 % of 1 842 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary98 % of 1 796 shared89 %
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary97 % of 1 777 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary97 % of 1 796 shared89 %
Péter MAGYAR Former memberEPPHungary91 % of 567 shared89 %
Davor Ivo STIER EPPCroatia83 % of 1 473 shared89 %
Liudas MAŽYLIS EPPLithuania83 % of 1 518 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania83 % of 1 442 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania83 % of 1 603 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia75 % of 1 841 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance75 % of 475 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania75 % of 1 398 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium74 % of 1 333 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia74 % of 1 685 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia74 % of 1 283 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium74 % of 1 795 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania74 % of 1 807 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium74 % of 1 686 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands74 % of 1 864 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded, 1 written statement; 5 on behalf of their group; 45 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Dec 2025The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
22 Oct 2025Allegations of espionage by the Hungarian government within the EU institutions (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Oct 2025The decision to impose a fine on Google: defending press and media freedom in the EU (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 Oct 2025Common agricultural policy (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2025This is Europe - Debate with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Luc Frieden (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
10 Sept 2025State of the Union (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025State of play of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act in the Member States (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 May 2025The Hungarian government's drift to Russia-style repression: legislative threats to freedom of expression and democratic participation (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 3 minRead
2 Apr 2025Delivering on the EU Roma Strategy and the fight against discrimination in the EU (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
2 Apr 2025Recent legislative changes in Hungary and their impact on fundamental rights (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 3 minRead
12 Mar 2025Union of Skills: striving for more and better opportunities to study, train or work in the EU and to bring our talents back home (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
11 Mar 2025European Council meetings and European security (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Mar 2025European Council meetings and European security (joint debate) Speech · 2 minRead
11 Feb 2025Political crisis in Serbia (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
22 Jan 2025Presentation of the programme of activities of the Polish Presidency (debate) StatementRead
17 Dec 2024Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
28 Nov 2024Foreign interference and espionage by third country actors in European universities (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
27 Nov 2024Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
26 Nov 2024Urgent need to tackle the gender pay gap (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
24 Oct 2024Abuse of new technologies to manipulate and radicalise young people through hate speech and antidemocratic discourse (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
9 Oct 2024Presentation of the programme of activities of the Hungarian Presidency (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 Oct 2024Facing fake news, populism and disinformation in the EU - the importance of public broadcasting, media pluralism and independent journalism (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Questions and motions, 7

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
24 Feb 2026Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756Written questionwith 17 co-authors29 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026
22 Dec 2025Serious concerns regarding compliance with European values and EU law in Slovakia E-10-2025-005054Written questionwith 12 co-authors21 Apr 2026
20 Dec 2025Implementation of EU anti-poverty strategy based on accurate data E-10-2025-005037Written questionwith 5 co-authors25 Feb 2026
12 Apr 2025Combating online piracy of live events close to two years after the recommendation’s adoption E-10-2025-001512Written questionwith 14 co-authors28 May 2025
17 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0057Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice” B-10-2024-0050Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—

Show all 7 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 6

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
12 Feb 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CULT-AM-784401 CULT4
8 Dec 2025Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments union CULT-AM-781320 CULT3
9 Sept 2025Audiovisual Media Services Directive obligations in the transatlantic dialogue CULT-AM-775676 CULT10
18 Jul 2025Protection of minors online CULT-AM-775622 CULT16
23 May 2025Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model CULT-AM-774268 CULT15
25 Feb 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world CULT-AM-770063 CULT11

Show all 6 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Zoltán TARR”. Member record. memberId 256863. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256863?page=77&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256863. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256863?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256863,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Zoltán TARR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256863?page=77&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256863?page=77&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256863. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256863. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}