Member

Dominik TARCZYŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group: ECR
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 63.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 86.2 %ⓘ of 392 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 16 of 326 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, JURI
Member id: 204346

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 16 of 326 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, JURI
Member id: 204346

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

63.5 %

394 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (−28.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.2 %

338 of 392 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.9 %

16 of 326 votes where their group had a clear line

6 opposite (for ↔ against), 9 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

14.7 %

58 of 394 votes cast

Participation 63.5 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	63.5 %
ECR median	91.9 %
Lowest in the group	51.0 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	79

With majority line 86.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	86.2 %
ECR median	87.7 %
Lowest in the group	46.1 %
Highest in the group	94.6 %
Members	79

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13	162 for, 424 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 3 to recital 11	257 for, 292 against, 59 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8	170 for, 412 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5	164 for, 425 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 29 to Article 11	353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3	175 for, 399 against, 23 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j	142 for, 434 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii	110 for, 432 against, 62 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii	119 for, 436 against, 51 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d	86 for, 479 against, 41 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b	154 for, 421 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a	175 for, 408 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1	322 for, 255 against, 36 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3	362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2	346 for, 254 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	161 for, 430 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	160 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1	345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	119 for, 434 against, 51 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4	158 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4	120 for, 433 against, 52 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4	161 for, 433 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2	369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2	114 for, 422 against, 60 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1	117 for, 422 against, 66 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text	314 for, 276 against, 17 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Establishment of the digital euro Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Negotiating mandate approved 416 for, 169 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 575 for, 33 against, 43 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital J	337 for, 273 against, 46 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 6 to recital J	292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 5, adding text after recital I	274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 4, adding text after recital I	383 for, 239 against, 34 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 2, adding text after recital C	374 for, 233 against, 45 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital B	625 for, 7 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22	196 for, 423 against, 17 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19	358 for, 166 against, 122 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14	348 for, 282 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9	489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3	488 for, 68 against, 68 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Abstained
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2	484 for, 78 against, 61 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1	453 for, 141 against, 45 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5	234 for, 367 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on paragraph 5	615 for, 33 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2	243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 2	567 for, 41 against, 50 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 1	628 for, 18 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1	194 for, 445 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 25 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	5
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	0
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	5
17 Dec 2024	6	0
18 Dec 2024	7	0
19 Dec 2024	5	0
21 Jan 2025	1	0
22 Jan 2025	1	0
23 Jan 2025	4	0
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	7
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	17
8 May 2025	12	0
22 May 2025	6	0
17 Jun 2025	8	0
18 Jun 2025	7	0
19 Jun 2025	6	0
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	0
8 Oct 2025	10	0
9 Oct 2025	10	0
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	4
13 Nov 2025	16	0
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	0
17 Dec 2025	11	0
18 Dec 2025	6	0
20 Jan 2026	6	0
21 Jan 2026	8	6
22 Jan 2026	8	4
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	9
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	11
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	0
29 Apr 2026	17	13
30 Apr 2026	11	10
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	6
7 Jul 2026	15	14
8 Jul 2026	15	14
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	0
16 Sept 2026	16	0
17 Sept 2026	10	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	ECR	Poland	99 % of 3 731 shared	81 %
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	ECR	Poland	99 % of 3 751 shared	81 %
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 633 shared	81 %
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 687 shared	81 %
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 491 shared	81 %
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 759 shared	81 %
Select Piotr MÜLLER	Piotr MÜLLER	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 509 shared	81 %
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 629 shared	81 %
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	ECR	Poland	98 % of 3 380 shared	81 %
Select Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	ECR	Poland	97 % of 3 621 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	72 % of 3 620 shared	68 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	71 % of 3 459 shared	48 %
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	71 % of 3 752 shared	68 %
Select Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Patriots	Spain	71 % of 3 566 shared	68 %
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Patriots	Spain	71 % of 3 430 shared	68 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	71 % of 3 146 shared	68 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	70 % of 2 177 shared	68 %
Select Nikola BARTŮŠEK	Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group	ECR	Czechia	70 % of 3 121 shared	62 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	70 % of 2 961 shared	68 %
Select Mieke ANDRIESE	Mieke ANDRIESE	Patriots	Netherlands	70 % of 1 856 shared	68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now

Show all 4 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods	Rapporteur	INTA	14 Apr 2026
Adjustment of customs duties on the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America and opening of tariff quotas for imports of certain goods originating in the United States of America	Rapporteur	INTA	14 Apr 2026
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People`s Republic of China pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union	Rapporteur	INTA	27 Jan 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty	Opinion rapporteur	INTA	1 Dec 2025
EU-US political relations	Opinion rapporteur	INTA	4 Sept 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	D-US	2 Jun 2025
Członek Komisji Prawnej, stały sprawozdawca ds. immunitetów	Rapporteur	JURI	3 Sept 2024

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

13 contributions recorded; 12 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
8 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Speech	Read
8 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Speech · 1 min	Read
24 Nov 2025	Order of business	Speech	Read
10 Sept 2025	Implementation of EU-US trade deal and the prospect of wider EU trade agreements (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Jul 2025	EU-China relations (joint debate)	Speech	Read
8 Jul 2025	EU-China relations (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Nov 2024	Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Oct 2024	State sponsored terrorism by the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of the recent attacks in Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 13 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 64

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
27 Aug 2026	The EU’s deadly anti-racism ideology: the death of Henry Nowak E-10-2026-003350	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	Not yet answered
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
14 Jul 2026	Transparency and subsidiarity safeguards for LGBTIQ-related funding under AgoraEU and CERV+ E-10-2026-002903	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	25 Aug 2026
2 Jun 2026	Risks associated with tariff quota management system in EU-Mercosur agreement E-10-2026-002238	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	27 Jul 2026
15 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-funded media attacking Christian symbols while applying double standards B-10-2026-0184	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
9 Apr 2026	EU institutional reform: two-speed Europe, unanimity under threat, and the rise of hidden federalism E-10-2026-001466	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	23 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026	Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026	Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923	Written questionwith 37 co-authors	4 May 2026
3 Mar 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154	Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors	—
3 Mar 2026	Call for EU action on Iran P-10-2026-000870	Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors	26 Mar 2026

Show all 64 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
5 Dec 2025	Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty INTA-AM-781273	INTA	4
12 Sept 2025	EU-US political relations INTA-AM-775733	INTA	3
23 Jul 2025	Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 CJ49-AM-775764	CJ49	18
23 Jul 2025	Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 CJ49-AM-775766	CJ49	22

Show all 4 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dominik TARCZYŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 204346. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204346. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/204346?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-204346,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dominik TARCZYŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 204346. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204346. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 64

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928