Skip to content

Member

Dominik TARCZYŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
63.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
86.2 %ⓘ of 392 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
16 of 326 votesⓘ
Committees
INTA, JURI
Member id
204346
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

63.5 %

394 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (−28.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.2 %

338 of 392 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.9 %

16 of 326 votes where their group had a clear line

6 opposite (for ↔ against), 9 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

14.7 %

58 of 394 votes cast

Participation 63.5 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI63.5 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 86.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI86.2 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 371 for, 260 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 126 to Article 1 173 for, 477 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 362 for, 272 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 181 for, 462 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 103 to Article 1 182 for, 441 against, 27 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 87 to Article 1 174 for, 465 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 4 451 for, 197 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 2 450 for, 196 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 1 636 for, 10 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
14 Sept 2026Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB 154 for, 216 against, 85 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 15 to recital K 208 for, 347 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 13 to recital D 238 for, 251 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 283 for, 216 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 279 for, 259 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 255 for, 315 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 366 for, 192 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 4, adding text after recital D 480 for, 77 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 3 to recital B 310 for, 261 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 334 for, 231 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 5 to paragraph 6 312 for, 248 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 301 for, 281 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 510 for, 1 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 1 to recital E 176 for, 412 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 5 to recital E 195 for, 391 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 4 to recital C — part 2 133 for, 422 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 4 to recital C — part 1 207 for, 379 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 148 for, 414 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 1 194 for, 392 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 476 for, 28 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 2 190 for, 402 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 1 177 for, 412 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 188 for, 330 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 7 — part 2 281 for, 285 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 7 — part 1 580 for, 2 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 100 for, 404 against, 94 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 72 for, 482 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 85 for, 445 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 5 543 for, 23 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 4 292 for, 279 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 3 563 for, 14 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 2 291 for, 280 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 1 583 for, 1 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 87 for, 454 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 172 for, 431 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 4 570 for, 10 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 3 532 for, 49 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 2 594 for, 0 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 1 594 for, 4 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text 276 for, 286 against, 30 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 25 to recital 32 157 for, 385 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 25 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland99 % of 3 731 shared81 %
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland99 % of 3 751 shared81 %
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 3 633 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland98 % of 3 687 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 3 491 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland98 % of 3 759 shared81 %
Piotr MÜLLER ECRPoland98 % of 3 509 shared81 %
Beata SZYDŁO ECRPoland98 % of 3 629 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland98 % of 3 380 shared81 %
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI ECRPoland97 % of 3 621 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal72 % of 3 620 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania71 % of 3 459 shared48 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 752 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 566 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 430 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 146 shared68 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia70 % of 2 177 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia70 % of 3 121 shared62 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain70 % of 2 961 shared68 %
Mieke ANDRIESE PatriotsNetherlands70 % of 1 856 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 4 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsRapporteurINTA14 Apr 2026
Adjustment of customs duties on the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America and opening of tariff quotas for imports of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaRapporteurINTA14 Apr 2026
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People`s Republic of China pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European UnionRapporteurINTA27 Jan 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereigntyOpinion rapporteurINTA1 Dec 2025
EU-US political relationsOpinion rapporteurINTA4 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationD-US2 Jun 2025
Członek Komisji Prawnej, stały sprawozdawca ds. immunitetówRapporteurJURI3 Sept 2024

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

13 contributions recorded; 12 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre SpeechRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
24 Nov 2025Order of business SpeechRead
10 Sept 2025Implementation of EU-US trade deal and the prospect of wider EU trade agreements (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
8 Jul 2025EU-China relations (joint debate) SpeechRead
8 Jul 2025EU-China relations (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Nov 2024Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Oct 2024State sponsored terrorism by the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of the recent attacks in Europe (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 13 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 64

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
27 Aug 2026The EU’s deadly anti-racism ideology: the death of Henry Nowak E-10-2026-003350Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
14 Jul 2026Transparency and subsidiarity safeguards for LGBTIQ-related funding under AgoraEU and CERV+ E-10-2026-002903Written questionwith 11 co-authors25 Aug 2026
2 Jun 2026Risks associated with tariff quota management system in EU-Mercosur agreement E-10-2026-002238Written questionwith 22 co-authors27 Jul 2026
15 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-funded media attacking Christian symbols while applying double standards B-10-2026-0184Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
9 Apr 2026EU institutional reform: two-speed Europe, unanimity under threat, and the rise of hidden federalism E-10-2026-001466Written questionwith 13 co-authors23 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410Written questionwith 25 co-authors18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923Written questionwith 37 co-authors4 May 2026
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
3 Mar 2026Call for EU action on Iran P-10-2026-000870Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors26 Mar 2026

Show all 64 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 4 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dominik TARCZYŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 204346. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204346. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/204346?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-204346,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dominik TARCZYŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=8&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 204346. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204346. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}