Member

Kim VAN SPARRENTAK

Greens · Netherlands

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 92.4 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.8 %ⓘ of 5 476 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: PRO Progressief Nederland
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 83 of 5 366 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL (substitute), IMCO
Member id: 197870

National party: PRO Progressief Nederland
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 83 of 5 366 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL (substitute), IMCO
Member id: 197870

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.4 %

5 477 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (+0.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.8 %

5 356 of 5 476 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (+0.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.5 %

83 of 5 366 votes where their group had a clear line

39 opposite (for ↔ against), 30 abstained against the line, 14 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.4 %

241 of 5 477 votes cast

Participation 92.4 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	92.4 %
Greens median	92.2 %
Lowest in the group	48.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	54

With majority line 97.8 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	97.8 %
Greens median	97.1 %
Lowest in the group	87.9 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	54

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	22
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	129
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	44
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	225
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	251
3 Apr 2025	62	59
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	220
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	52
16 Jun 2025	2	1
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	86
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	35
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	68
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	185
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	267
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	0
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	111
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	37
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	140
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	197
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	224
29 Apr 2026	296	294
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	0
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	126
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	0
8 Jul 2026	144	0
9 Jul 2026	67	0
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	155
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Greens	Netherlands	100 % of 5 035 shared	94 %
Select Tineke STRIK	Tineke STRIK	Greens	Netherlands	99 % of 5 218 shared	94 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	98 % of 4 687 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	98 % of 5 059 shared	94 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	97 % of 4 631 shared	94 %
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Greens	Belgium	97 % of 4 742 shared	94 %
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Greens	Finland	97 % of 4 089 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 217 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 420 shared	94 %
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Greens	Germany	97 % of 4 972 shared	94 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 4 754 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 5 326 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 5 459 shared	83 %
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	89 % of 4 396 shared	83 %
Select Lara WOLTERS	Lara WOLTERS	S&D	Netherlands	89 % of 4 962 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	88 % of 4 858 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	88 % of 4 595 shared	83 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	88 % of 4 158 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	88 % of 3 797 shared	83 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	87 % of 4 993 shared	83 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Pan-African ParliamentDPAP Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Member	14 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	EMPL	8 Jun 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	29 Jan 2026
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Shadow rapporteur	EUDS	27 Jan 2026
Registration documents for vehicles and vehicle registration data recorded in national vehicle registers	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	10 Nov 2025
Establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	8 Jul 2025
Electric vehicle supply equipment, compressed gas dispensers, and electricity, gas and thermal energy meters	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	12 May 2025
Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	24 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	EUDS	17 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	EMPL	25 Feb 2025
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world – 2024/2051(INI) – IMCO/10/01078	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	30 Jan 2025

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

39 contributions recorded; 14 on behalf of their group; 54 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 May 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	European Citizens’ Initiative 'Ban on conversion practices in the European Union' (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	International Women’s Day	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Single Market: how to move from an incomplete single market to one market for one Europe (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 39 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 69

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
13 Sept 2026	Repeated ban on Oradea Pride and compliance with fundamental rights in the use of EU funds E-10-2026-003648	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Extraterritorial impact of the US designation of Autistici/Inventati as a terrorist entity P-10-2026-003526	Priority written questionwith 28 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Jul 2026	State of play of negotiations on the agreement on the exchange of personal data between Europol and Israel E-10-2026-002925	Written questionwith 24 co-authors	1 Sept 2026
8 Jul 2026	European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Jul 2026	Impact of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on the EU–US Data Privacy Framework and European data sovereignty E-10-2026-002823	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	Not yet answered
30 Jun 2026	Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026	Appointment of Jim Hagemann Snabe as Special Envoy for Industrial Artificial Intelligence E-10-2026-002410	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
9 Jun 2026	Sovereignty of European payment system Wero P-10-2026-002371	Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
19 May 2026	Use of Hungarian public funds for organised activities concerning transnational political influence in the EU democratic space E-10-2026-002058	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	1 Sept 2026

Show all 69 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 21

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jun 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' EMPL-AM-790022	EMPL	42
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784275	CJ40	21
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784309	CJ40	5
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784274	CJ40	13
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784406	EUDS	15
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784367	EUDS	29
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784405	EUDS	15
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784407	EUDS	30
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784408	EUDS	21
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784433	EUDS	18

Show all 21 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?nb=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Kim VAN SPARRENTAK”. Member record. memberId 197870. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?nb=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197870. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197870?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197870,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Kim VAN SPARRENTAK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?nb=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197870?nb=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197870. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197870. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 69

Amendments tabled in committee, 21

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928