Skip to content

Member

Milan UHRÍK

ESN · Slovakia

Group
ESN
Country
Slovakia
Roll-call participation
94.7 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
84.1 %ⓘ of 586 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 93.9 %
More facts (5)
National party
HREP Hnutie Republika
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
75 of 562 votesⓘ
Committees
LIBE
Member id
197763
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.7 %

587 of 620 final votes while in office

ESN median: 90.8 % (+3.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.1 %

493 of 586 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 93.9 % (−9.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

13.3 %

75 of 562 votes where their group had a clear line

11 opposite (for ↔ against), 51 abstained against the line, 13 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

21.3 %

125 of 587 votes cast

Participation 94.7 % — ESN median 90.8 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Milan UHRÍK94.7 %
ESN median90.8 %
Lowest in the group65.8 %
Highest in the group97.7 %
Members27
With majority line 84.1 % — ESN median 93.9 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Milan UHRÍK84.1 %
ESN median93.9 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members27
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 138 for, 468 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 2 — part 2 461 for, 130 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 128 for, 469 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 248 for, 294 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 1 — part 2 478 for, 117 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 134 for, 436 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 2 413 for, 143 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 1 575 for, 13 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 2 403 for, 146 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 1 449 for, 100 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 63 — part 3 401 for, 181 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55 197 for, 400 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29 189 for, 387 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Separate vote on paragraph 17 487 for, 45 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 373 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 145 for, 417 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 153 for, 424 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Separate vote on paragraph 3 517 for, 8 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified maize MON 87460 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 433 for, 159 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94313 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 457 for, 184 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 442 for, 184 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 19 359 for, 210 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 9 353 for, 204 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 2 311 for, 309 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 1 466 for, 128 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AB 354 for, 205 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AA 362 for, 208 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital Z 431 for, 165 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 2 335 for, 279 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 1 509 for, 115 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital D 593 for, 37 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 2 411 for, 213 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 1 395 for, 179 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 3 351 for, 272 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 2 429 for, 153 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 1 460 for, 129 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 3 325 for, 296 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 2 446 for, 138 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 1 450 for, 168 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 60 386 for, 230 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 3 322 for, 313 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 2 409 for, 150 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 1 510 for, 78 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Milan MAZUREK changed group ESNSlovakia97 % of 4 778 shared80 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany79 % of 4 103 shared80 %
Stanislav STOYANOV ESNBulgaria79 % of 5 132 shared80 %
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany79 % of 5 191 shared80 %
Rada LAYKOVA ESNBulgaria79 % of 4 589 shared80 %
Siegbert Frank DROESE ESNGermany79 % of 5 042 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany79 % of 5 298 shared80 %
Tomasz FROELICH ESNGermany78 % of 5 344 shared80 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany78 % of 4 209 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany78 % of 5 080 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Milan MAZUREK changed group ESNSlovakia88 % of 500 shared49 %
Petra STEGER PatriotsAustria74 % of 5 385 shared70 %
Gerald HAUSER PatriotsAustria73 % of 5 231 shared70 %
Georg MAYER PatriotsAustria73 % of 4 669 shared70 %
Roman HAIDER PatriotsAustria73 % of 5 520 shared70 %
Elisabeth DIERINGER PatriotsAustria73 % of 5 499 shared70 %
Harald VILIMSKY PatriotsAustria72 % of 5 329 shared70 %
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland71 % of 1 349 shared70 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland70 % of 4 960 shared69 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium69 % of 5 534 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary CommitteesDMAG DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 4 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE15 Sept 2026
Proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedShadow rapporteurLIBE12 Sept 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union levelShadow rapporteurLIBE22 Jul 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE21 May 2025
LIBE own-initiative report on the Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportShadow rapporteurLIBE18 Oct 2024

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

65 contributions recorded; 39 on behalf of their group; 78 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026EU’s response and preparedness to protect people against recurring heatwaves and upcoming wildfires (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 2026Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2026Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
21 May 2026European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Stop destroying videogames’ (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) on behalf of ESNSpeech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 59

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0410Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
27 Aug 2026The EU’s deadly anti-racism ideology: the death of Henry Nowak E-10-2026-003350Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Commission’s ‘anti-racism’ strategy: towards a presumption that European societies are racist? E-10-2026-002952Written questionwith 11 co-authors21 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Strategic developments impacting Eurojust’s counter-terrorism casework P-10-2026-002765Priority written question27 Aug 2026
11 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
3 Jun 2026Ukraine’s glorification of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army criminals and the EU accession process E-10-2026-002283Written questionwith 7 co-authors14 Aug 2026
21 May 2026Liabilities of each participating Member State for the EUR 90 billion EU loan package for Ukraine E-10-2026-002108Written questionwith 12 co-authors16 Jul 2026
30 Apr 2026Concerns about the EU’s new age verification app E-10-2026-001771Written questionwith 10 co-authors6 Jul 2026
24 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for an effective application of migration conditionality in EU development aid B-10-2026-0192Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author—
9 Apr 2026EU institutional reform: two-speed Europe, unanimity under threat, and the rise of hidden federalism E-10-2026-001466Written questionwith 13 co-authors23 Jul 2026

Show all 59 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 25

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
1 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) LIBE-AM-790741 LIBE10
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057 CJ651
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058 CJ654
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059 CJ651
19 May 2026Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693 CJ03-AM-788926 CJ032
30 Apr 2026Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 LIBE-AM-787915 LIBE3
8 Apr 2026Establishing Global Europe LIBE-AM-786907 LIBE16
8 Apr 2026Establishing Global Europe LIBE-AM-786903 LIBE5
15 Dec 2025The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025 LIBE-AM-781446 LIBE8
1 Dec 2025Establishing a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union, and repealing Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, Council Directive 2001/40/EC and Council Decision 2004/191/EC LIBE-AM-781177 LIBE1

Show all 25 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Milan UHRÍK”. Member record. memberId 197763. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197763?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197763. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197763?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197763,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Milan UHRÍK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197763?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197763?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197763. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197763. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}