Skip to content

Member

Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR

S&D · Spain

Group
S&D
Country
Spain
Roll-call participation
91.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.9 %ⓘ of 570 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSOE Partido Socialista Obrero Español
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
10 of 563 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
197722
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.9 %

570 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+2.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.9 %

558 of 570 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+0.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.8 %

10 of 563 votes where their group had a clear line

7 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.1 %

6 of 570 votes cast

Participation 91.9 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR91.9 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 97.9 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR97.9 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain99 % of 4 660 shared93 %
Rosa SERRANO SIERRA S&DSpain99 % of 5 421 shared93 %
Idoia MENDIA S&DSpain99 % of 5 332 shared93 %
Marcos ROS SEMPERE S&DSpain99 % of 4 944 shared93 %
Elena SANCHO MURILLO S&DSpain99 % of 5 431 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain99 % of 3 608 shared93 %
José CEPEDA S&DSpain99 % of 4 687 shared93 %
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ S&DSpain99 % of 4 969 shared93 %
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ S&DSpain98 % of 5 077 shared93 %
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ S&DSpain98 % of 4 913 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia89 % of 4 665 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance89 % of 4 888 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium89 % of 3 866 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance88 % of 4 816 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania88 % of 5 155 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg88 % of 5 079 shared86 %
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU RenewRomania88 % of 4 569 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 386 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance88 % of 5 198 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 449 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationSubstitute24 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on European Cultural Heritage, Ways of Saint James and other European Cultural RoutesIG10-11 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET3 Sept 2026
Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries Opinion rapporteurAFET8 Apr 2026
Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligenceRapporteurAFET26 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET13 Feb 2026
2025 Commission report on TürkiyeRapporteurAFET11 Dec 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI4 Dec 2025
Participation in the 12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly in Yerevan, Armenia on 28-30 October, 2025.Official delegationDEPA20 Oct 2025
Member of the official EP Mission to EURONEST Yerevan from 27 to 30 October 2025.Official delegationDEPA30 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET15 Jul 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET9 Jul 2025

Show all 21 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

69 contributions recorded, 20 written statements; 10 on behalf of their group; 72 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) StatementRead
14 Sept 2026Government crackdown on the LGBTIQ+ Community in Türkiye: Türkiye’s compliance with its international commitments on non-discrimination (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026The EU’s role in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and the accountability of Israel under international law (topical debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026EU’s response and preparedness to protect people against recurring heatwaves and upcoming wildfires (debate) StatementRead
17 Jun 2026Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye (A10-0106/2026 - Nacho Sánchez Amor) (vote) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
16 Jun 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye (debate) Speech · 4 minRead
16 Jun 2026The role of the EU in efforts for peace and stability throughout the Middle East after the announced deal between the US and Iran (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
20 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban's adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 67

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Aug 2026Protection of civil society organisations monitoring sanctions compliance using the same analytical methodology as the European Commission and EU Member States P-10-2026-003254Priority written question18 Sept 2026
24 Jul 2026Compatibility with EU law of legislative measures adopted by the Parliament of the Autonomous Community of Valencia with regard to ‘national priority’ E-10-2026-003118Written questionwith 16 co-authors15 Sept 2026
2 Jul 2026Sale of assets confiscated from opponents by the Ortega and Murillo regime in Nicaragua E-10-2026-002747Written questionwith 6 co-authors7 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
12 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba B-10-2026-0287Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors—
9 Jun 2026Chinese tomato concentrate imports: protecting EU producers and food security P-10-2026-002375Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors13 Jul 2026
13 May 2026EU trade with Israeli settlements, illegal under international law E-10-2026-001997Written question4 Aug 2026
13 May 2026Commission to host Taliban in talks on Afghan deportations E-10-2026-001996Written question30 Jul 2026
6 May 2026European capacity for AI-driven large-scale vulnerability research and cybersecurity resilience E-10-2026-001844Written questionwith 3 co-authors12 Aug 2026
6 May 2026European regulatory gap regarding offensive AI capabilities E-10-2026-001843Written questionwith 3 co-authors7 Jul 2026
28 Apr 2026Compatibility of the principle of ‘national priority’ with EU law E-10-2026-001720Written questionwith 19 co-authors1 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0201Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
24 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on supporting democratic resilience in Armenia B-10-2026-0198Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
21 Apr 2026Customs practices related to products imported from illegal Israeli settlements in the OPTs E-10-2026-001633Written questionwith 71 co-authors16 Jul 2026
2 Apr 2026Double standards in the EU’s relationship with Israel E-10-2026-001373Written questionwith 2 co-authorsNot yet answered
2 Apr 2026Double standards in the EU’s relationship with Israel E-10-2026-001376Written questionwith 4 co-authors27 May 2026
27 Mar 2026The content of the new European security strategy and related competences E-10-2026-001299Written questionwith 2 co-authors28 Jul 2026
26 Mar 2026Continued EU political and financial support to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) P-10-2026-001277Priority written questionwith 27 co-authors6 May 2026
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Elene Khoshtaria and political prisoners under the Georgian Dream regime B-10-2026-0171Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
19 Feb 2026The European Parliament’s call to trigger the blocking statute to protect and safeguard the International Criminal Court E-10-2026-000718Written questionwith 54 co-authors13 May 2026
10 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0144Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts B-10-2026-0129Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions, and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran B-10-2026-0128Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors—
9 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire B-10-2026-0138Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
19 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal repression against protesters in Iran B-10-2026-0095Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
18 Dec 2025State of play regarding the partial suspension of the Association Agreement with Israel in the Council E-10-2025-005017Written questionwith 2 co-authors3 Feb 2026
10 Dec 2025State of play regarding the partial suspension of the Association Agreement with Israel E-10-2025-004880Written questionwith 2 co-authors23 Apr 2026
25 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine B-10-2025-0547Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
24 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the Rohingya B-10-2025-0513Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
18 Nov 2025The United States’ ‘bully’ tactics at the International Maritime Organization meeting, and their effect on EU foreign policy E-10-2025-004590Written question27 Feb 2026
22 Oct 2025The ongoing disinformation campaign targeting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees in the Near East and the EU’s support to the agency E-10-2025-004158Written questionwith 41 co-authors25 Mar 2026
22 Oct 2025The reintroduction of the death penalty in Kyrgyzstan and the implications for the EU-Kyrgyzstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement E-10-2025-004150Written question21 Jan 2026
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy B-10-2025-0459Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
15 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus, five years after the stolen presidential elections B-10-2025-0453Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
3 Oct 2025The unresolved situation of displaced people and prisoners of war from Nagorno-Karabakh after the peace deal E-10-2025-003885Written questionwith 3 co-authors20 Jan 2026
26 Sept 2025Serious human rights violations and democratic backsliding in Ecuador: possible implications for the EU-Ecuador agreement E-10-2025-003764Written questionwith 4 co-authors20 Nov 2025
26 Sept 2025Loss of EU funding due to Israeli blockades hindering humanitarian aid and essential services from entering Gaza and the occupied territories P-10-2025-003756Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors17 Nov 2025
19 Sept 2025Reaction to Fiji’s decision to open a new embassy in Jerusalem E-10-2025-003634Written question13 Nov 2025
9 Sept 2025Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482Written questionwith 108 co-authors4 Nov 2025
8 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Gaza at the breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release the hostages and to move towards a two-state solution B-10-2025-0372Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
3 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference B-10-2025-0357Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
17 Jul 2025Humanitarian aid in Gaza and occupied West Bank and possibility of suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement E-10-2025-002981Written questionwith 30 co-authors2 Oct 2025
16 Jul 2025Concerns over Israeli online campaigns and enforcement of DSA obligations E-10-2025-002936Written questionwith 31 co-authors12 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians B-10-2025-0305Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
11 Apr 2025Safeguarding the memory of Argentina’s desaparecidos E-10-2025-001499Written questionwith 14 co-authors17 Jul 2025
10 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of unlawful detention and sham trial of Armenian hostages,including high-ranking political representatives from Nagorno Karabakh, by Azerbaijan B-10-2025-0184Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
7 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria B-10-2025-0157Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
7 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression B-10-2025-0156Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
10 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the recent dismissals and arrests of mayors in Turkey B-10-2025-0119Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
10 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia B-10-2025-0112Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
20 Jan 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine B-10-2025-0074Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
17 Jan 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus B-10-2025-0058Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
16 Dec 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights situation in Kyrgyzstan, in particular the case of Temirlan Sultanbekov B-10-2024-0224Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
29 Nov 2024Restructuring of EEAS Delegations abroad P-10-2024-002704Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors25 Feb 2025
28 Nov 2024Blatant disregard of International Criminal Court decisions by the Hungarian Prime Minister E-10-2024-002697Written questionwith 45 co-authors6 Feb 2025
25 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia B-10-2024-0193Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
22 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud B-10-2024-0183Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
6 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against Russia B-10-2024-0161Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
30 Oct 2024Human rights impact assessment in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding E-10-2024-002329Written questionwith 1 co-author22 Apr 2025
21 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with Armenia B-10-2024-0136Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
17 Oct 2024Launch of European humanitarian corridors from Lebanon to the EU E-10-2024-002127Written questionwith 55 co-authors12 Feb 2025
7 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye B-10-2024-0098Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
4 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia B-10-2024-0084Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
4 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration B-10-2024-0085Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—
27 Sept 2024Cofinancing for bluetongue serotype 3 vaccines in the Union E-10-2024-001850Written questionwith 1 co-author15 Nov 2024
27 Sept 2024EU response to UNRWA disinformation campaign E-10-2024-001862Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Mar 2025
5 Sept 2024New Afghan morality law or law of silence, the culmination of a regime of ‘gender apartheid ’ P-10-2024-001630Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors14 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 53

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 53 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Spain National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR”. Member record. memberId 197722. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197722?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197722. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197722?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197722,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197722?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197722?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197722. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197722. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}