Skip to content

Member · Former member

Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE

Renew · France · left on 11 October 2025

Group
Renew
Country
France
Roll-call participation
98.1 %ⓘ of 2 425 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
95.4 %ⓘ of 2 376 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 95.5 %
More facts (4)
National party
MoDem Mouvement Démocrate
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 11 Oct 2025 (left on 11 October 2025)
Against clear line
79 of 2 323 votesⓘ
Member id
197502
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.1 %

2 379 of 2 425 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 90.4 % (+7.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.4 %

2 267 of 2 376 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 95.5 % (−0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.4 %

79 of 2 323 votes where their group had a clear line

68 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.1 %

25 of 2 379 votes cast

Participation 98.1 % — Renew median 90.4 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE98.1 %
Renew median90.4 %
Lowest in the group65.3 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members76
With majority line 95.4 % — Renew median 95.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE95.4 %
Renew median95.5 %
Lowest in the group77.5 %
Highest in the group98.3 %
Members76
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 425

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 606 for, 5 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Final votePassed 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 395 to recital 19 187 for, 442 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 208 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 530 for, 112 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 204 for, 438 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 137 for, 447 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 134 to Article 6 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 401 to Article 6 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive 197 for, 418 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Sept 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PPE 384 for, 10 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 523 for, 75 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 157 for, 428 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 95 for, 420 against, 119 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Paragraph 13 — part 2 483 for, 84 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 80 for, 407 against, 151 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 79 for, 531 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 5 to paragraph 10 47 for, 560 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 88 for, 520 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 63 for, 552 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 123 for, 390 against, 110 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 494 for, 83 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 2, adding text after recital S 217 for, 409 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 226 for, 409 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 34 — part 2 566 for, 60 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 32 — part 1 588 for, 56 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 26 200 for, 417 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 193 for, 443 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 192 for, 462 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 60 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance98 % of 2 295 shared92 %
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance98 % of 2 303 shared92 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance98 % of 1 640 shared92 %
Christophe GRUDLER RenewFrance98 % of 2 268 shared92 %
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN RenewFrance98 % of 2 137 shared92 %
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance98 % of 1 917 shared92 %
Sandro GOZI RenewFrance98 % of 2 299 shared92 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance97 % of 2 280 shared92 %
Grégory ALLIONE RenewFrance97 % of 2 133 shared92 %
Gilles BOYER RenewFrance97 % of 2 364 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Isabel WISELER-LIMA EPPLuxembourg88 % of 2 252 shared82 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania88 % of 1 443 shared86 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany88 % of 1 760 shared86 %
Francisco ASSIS S&DPortugal88 % of 2 181 shared86 %
César LUENA S&DSpain87 % of 2 344 shared86 %
Idoia MENDIA S&DSpain87 % of 2 280 shared86 %
Jens GEIER S&DGermany87 % of 2 118 shared86 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg87 % of 1 375 shared82 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal87 % of 2 266 shared86 %
Liesbet SOMMEN EPPBelgium87 % of 2 222 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

18 contributions recorded; 4 on behalf of their group; 23 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 18 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 12

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
23 Sept 2025Emotional dependence on artificial intelligence (AI) systems E-10-2025-003674Written questionwith 21 co-authors7 Nov 2025
19 Sept 2025Suspension of the EU-Qatar agreement on air transport O-10-2025-000031Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Jul 2025Study on the potential costs and impact of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) on the pharmaceutical and cosmetic sectors. E-10-2025-002988Written questionwith 24 co-authors26 Sept 2025
4 Jul 2025The abuse of state advertising for political influence and enforcement of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) E-10-2025-002736Written questionwith 23 co-authors28 Aug 2025
30 Jun 2025Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the context of EU-US trade negotiations P-10-2025-002647Priority written questionwith 24 co-authors29 Jul 2025
21 Feb 2025Working conditions of artists and workers in the cultural and creative sectors and industries E-10-2025-000809Written questionwith 7 co-authors22 Apr 2025
17 Feb 2025EU-Mercosur trade agreement E-10-2025-000716Written questionwith 25 co-authors24 Apr 2025
1 Oct 2024Participation in the Erasmus+ programme and compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union E-10-2024-001911Written questionwith 7 co-authors16 Dec 2024
26 Sept 2024The spread of bluetongue virus throughout the EU E-10-2024-001845Written questionwith 39 co-authors15 Nov 2024
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of José Daniel Ferrer García in Cuba B-10-2024-0043Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—

Show all 12 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 24

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
25 Sept 2025EU-US political relations INTA-AM-778046 INTA5
12 Sept 2025EU-US political relations INTA-AM-775733 INTA17
5 Sept 2025Laying a framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest, and amending Regulation (EU) 2024/795 ITRE-AM-776912 ITRE38
23 Jul 2025Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 CJ49-AM-775764 CJ4919
23 Jul 2025Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 CJ49-AM-775766 CJ499
18 Jul 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/691 as regards support to workers affected by imminent job displacement in enterprises undergoing restructuring EMPL-AM-775725 EMPL29
4 Jun 2025Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 CJ52-AM-774325 CJ523
4 Jun 2025Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 CJ52-AM-774328 CJ5211
21 May 2025Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review EMPL-AM-774210 EMPL12
20 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges EMPL-AM-773390 EMPL2
11 Apr 2025Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports INTA-AM-772177 INTA13
9 Apr 2025Public procurement EMPL-AM-772163 EMPL20
21 Mar 2025Security of energy supply in the EU ITRE-AM-770279 ITRE2
21 Mar 2025Security of energy supply in the EU ITRE-AM-771895 ITRE1
4 Feb 2025on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council INTA-AM-768105 INTA25
4 Feb 2025on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council INTA-AM-768131 INTA42
18 Dec 2024proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an EU talent pool EMPL-AM-766831 EMPL37
18 Dec 2024Establishing an EU talent pool EMPL-AM-766953 EMPL112
6 Dec 2024The screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council ITRE-AM-766797 ITRE42
21 Nov 20242023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Agencies EMPL-AM-766645 EMPL18
21 Nov 20242023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Commission EMPL-AM-766646 EMPL7
19 Nov 2024The European Social Fund Plus post-2027 EMPL-AM-766605 EMPL40
7 Nov 2024Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights EMPL-AM-765265 EMPL23
10 Sept 2024Proposal for a Council Decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-763116 EMPL7

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version d08721fad549 (5 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
5 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE”. Member record. memberId 197502. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197502?amendments=all&page=7&vscope=all (retrieved 5 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197502. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197502?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version d08721fad549 (5 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197502,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197502?amendments=all&page=7&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197502?amendments=all&page=7&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-05},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197502. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197502. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version d08721fad549 (5 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}