Skip to content

Member

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
94.2 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
86.2 %ⓘ of 580 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
20 of 481 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
197501
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.2 %

584 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+2.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.2 %

500 of 580 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.2 %

20 of 481 votes where their group had a clear line

8 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.9 %

81 of 584 votes cast

Participation 94.2 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI94.2 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 86.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI86.2 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 72 210 for, 424 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 72 209 for, 397 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 70 206 for, 431 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 226 for, 384 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 54 185 for, 423 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 51 207 for, 421 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 37 277 for, 319 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 28 237 for, 405 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 425 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings Final vote — text as a wholeDischarge decision adopted 513 for, 101 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 12 203 for, 440 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Final vote — text as a whole 503 for, 121 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 35 to paragraph 142 169 for, 446 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 34 to paragraph 108 200 for, 448 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 27 to paragraph 102 345 for, 286 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 36 to paragraph 96 643 for, 11 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 33 to paragraph 85 200 for, 426 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 32 to paragraph 81 201 for, 452 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 188 for, 448 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 200 for, 446 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 18 213 for, 421 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 31 to paragraph 18 194 for, 452 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 14 to paragraph 18 192 for, 439 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 30 to paragraph 17 195 for, 459 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8 192 for, 454 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Final voteDischarge decision adopted 473 for, 120 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Final vote 520 for, 126 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Final vote — text as a whole 452 for, 176 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 4 to paragraph 102 — part 3 356 for, 269 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 4 to paragraph 102 — part 2 484 for, 20 against, 143 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 4 to paragraph 102 — part 1 509 for, 66 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 96 168 for, 450 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 96 244 for, 237 against, 169 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 96 191 for, 453 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Paragraph 95 — part 2 441 for, 199 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Paragraph 93 — part 2 461 for, 185 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Paragraph 18 — part 3 458 for, 154 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Paragraph 18 — part 2 459 for, 171 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Paragraph 8 — part 2 456 for, 185 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 192 for, 443 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 209 for, 413 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Final voteDischarge decision adopted 481 for, 157 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Final vote — text as a whole 475 for, 136 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 82 187 for, 465 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Paragraph 40 — part 2 415 for, 133 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Paragraph 33 — part 1 457 for, 88 against, 98 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Paragraph 31 — part 2 412 for, 152 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Amendment 6 to paragraph 10 271 for, 290 against, 90 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Amendment 1 to paragraph 10 231 for, 384 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
7 May 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9 143 for, 455 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland98 % of 5 484 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 5 014 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland97 % of 5 426 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland97 % of 5 504 shared81 %
Piotr MÜLLER ECRPoland97 % of 4 727 shared81 %
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 487 shared81 %
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI ECRPoland97 % of 3 621 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland97 % of 4 554 shared81 %
Beata SZYDŁO ECRPoland97 % of 5 457 shared81 %
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 363 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 5 294 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain74 % of 4 904 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 263 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 167 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 499 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania73 % of 4 572 shared48 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 5 038 shared67 %
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 193 shared68 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 105 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia72 % of 4 548 shared62 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeMember19 Jul 20246 Oct 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT28 Jan 2026
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsShadow rapporteurCONT17 Nov 2025
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilRapporteurCONT24 Sept 2025
Combating VAT fraud – the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budgetShadow rapporteurCONT3 Jul 2025
2024/0804(NLE) Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors – BG nomineeShadow rapporteurCONT14 Nov 2024
2024/2030(DEC) 2023 Discharge - Decentralised AgenciesShadow rapporteurCONT10 Oct 2024
2024/2031 (DEC) 2023 Discharge: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsShadow rapporteurCONT10 Oct 2024
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
\"\"2023 Discharge – European Council and Council – 2024/2021(DEC)\"\"RapporteurCONT12 Sept 2024
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service - 2024/2024(DEC)RapporteurCONT12 Sept 2024

Show all 14 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

56 contributions recorded, 26 written statements; 6 on behalf of their group; 53 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) StatementRead
8 Jul 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate) StatementRead
16 Jun 2026Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) (debate) StatementRead
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Situation in Lebanon: implementation of the ceasefire, support peace efforts and humanitarian access (debate) StatementRead
25 Mar 2026Combating corruption (debate) StatementRead
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate) StatementRead
11 Feb 2026Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) StatementRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 98

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0420Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0411Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0419Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the Escalating Violations of International Humanitarian Law and the Human Rights Situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0363Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0351Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
17 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0329Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0327Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua - the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0317Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—

Show all 98 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 26

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 26 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 197501. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=91&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197501?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197501,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=91&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=91&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197501. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}