Member

Sergey LAGODINSKY

Greens · Germany

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 76.1 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 94.9 %ⓘ of 472 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %

More facts (5)

National party: GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 18 of 456 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, ITRE (substitute), JURI
Member id: 197460

National party: GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 18 of 456 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, ITRE (substitute), JURI
Member id: 197460

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.1 %

472 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (−16.1 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.9 %

448 of 472 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.9 %

18 of 456 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 12 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

5.1 %

24 of 472 votes cast

Participation 76.1 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sergey LAGODINSKY	76.1 %
Greens median	92.3 %
Lowest in the group	44.2 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	54

With majority line 94.9 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sergey LAGODINSKY	94.9 %
Greens median	96.4 %
Lowest in the group	82.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	54

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5	343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5	338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5	201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5	200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4	437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4	231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4	272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4	124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4	427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4	267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3	194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3	136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3	92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2	203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2	524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1	596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1	427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1	111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2	435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H	200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2	344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1	378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B	195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22	186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5	207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2	512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1	602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2	210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1	210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2	347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1	381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1	181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1	196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2	344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1	213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G	141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22	452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20	480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3	582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2	275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1	490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12	475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4	478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3	489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2	479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3	474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2	499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 16 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	4
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	6
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	3
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	0
2 Apr 2025	9	0
3 Apr 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	4	0
7 May 2025	20	0
8 May 2025	12	0
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	5
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	5
9 Sept 2025	6	5
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	6
7 Oct 2025	4	0
8 Oct 2025	10	0
9 Oct 2025	10	0
21 Oct 2025	8	7
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	0
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	10
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	0
11 Mar 2026	12	0
12 Mar 2026	6	0
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	15
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	0
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	3
15 Sept 2026	12	11
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	97 % of 3 968 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	97 % of 4 302 shared	94 %
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Greens	Germany	97 % of 4 313 shared	94 %
Select Hannah NEUMANN	Hannah NEUMANN	Greens	Germany	97 % of 3 967 shared	94 %
Select Martin HÄUSLING	Martin HÄUSLING	Greens	Germany	96 % of 4 258 shared	94 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	96 % of 3 667 shared	94 %
Select Alexandra GEESE	Alexandra GEESE	Greens	Germany	96 % of 3 801 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	96 % of 4 037 shared	94 %
Select Jutta PAULUS	Jutta PAULUS	Greens	Germany	96 % of 3 881 shared	94 %
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Greens	Germany	96 % of 3 927 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	88 % of 3 390 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	87 % of 3 888 shared	83 %
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 3 635 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 4 192 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	87 % of 3 128 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	87 % of 3 644 shared	83 %
Select Lara WOLTERS	Lara WOLTERS	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 3 971 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 4 305 shared	83 %
Select Murielle LAURENT	Murielle LAURENT	S&D	France	86 % of 4 057 shared	83 %
Select Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	S&D	France	86 % of 4 155 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly	Chair	3 Oct 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working group	Member	30 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on the Two-State Solution for Israel and PalestineIG10-26 Intergroup / working group	Member	29 Jan 2025	now

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Cloud and AI Development Act	Opinion rapporteur	JURI	17 Sept 2026
European Union Space Services Agency and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/696	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	17 Sept 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for a review of the EU's Black Sea strategy	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	16 Sept 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the foreign policy response to external interference in the EU's neighbourhood	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	8 Sept 2026
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	17 Jul 2026
92nd EU-US IPM/TLD - San Francisco	Official delegation	D-US	17 Jul 2026
82nd EU-Türkiye JPC Meeting 26-27 October 2026, Ankara	Official delegation	D-TR	17 Jul 2026
Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act)	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	JURI	30 Jun 2026
Amendments to the Decision of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 adopting the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, regarding proxy voting	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	30 Jun 2026
EU US Transatlantic Legislators Dialogue	Official delegation	D-US	17 Jun 2026

Show all 31 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

72 contributions recorded; 22 on behalf of their group; 99 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Future of EU support for Russian democratic forces, anti-war actors and repressed civil society (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (A10-0172/2026 - Michael Gahler) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 54

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
18 Jun 2026	Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	6 Aug 2026
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0324	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0307	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
10 Jun 2026	Potential conflict of interest in the appointment of the Special Envoy for Industrial AI P-10-2026-002401	Priority written questionwith 37 co-authors	13 Aug 2026
8 May 2026	Export of alumina from a Member State entering the Russian military supply chain E-10-2026-001908	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	29 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0204	Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors	—
10 Feb 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0143	Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors	—
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060	Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors	—
15 Dec 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania B-10-2025-0578	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—

Show all 54 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 30

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
11 Sept 2026	Amendments to the Decision of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 adopting the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, regarding proxy voting JURI-AM-792153	JURI	2
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	35
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	28
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	24
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	18
29 Jun 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) JURI-AM-790241	JURI	65
13 May 2026	Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE) CJ55-AM-788873	CJ55	32
20 Apr 2026	Establishment of European Business Wallets JURI-AM-787721	JURI	48
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786883	ITRE	57
14 Apr 2026	Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union ITRE-AM-786873	ITRE	50

Show all 30 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197460?page=2&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sergey LAGODINSKY”. Member record. memberId 197460. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197460?page=2&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197460. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197460?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197460,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sergey LAGODINSKY}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197460?page=2&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197460?page=2&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197460. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197460. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 54

Amendments tabled in committee, 30

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928