Member

Sven SIMON

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 84.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 98.5 %ⓘ of 526 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 5 of 490 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (chair), AFET (substitute)
Member id: 197426

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 5 of 490 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (chair), AFET (substitute)
Member id: 197426

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

84.8 %

526 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−5.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.5 %

518 of 526 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.0 %

5 of 490 votes where their group had a clear line

5 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 526 votes cast

Participation 84.8 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sven SIMON	84.8 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 98.5 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sven SIMON	98.5 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	0
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	6
19 Dec 2024	5	4
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	3
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	6
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	7
3 Apr 2025	5	4
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	15
8 May 2025	12	0
22 May 2025	6	0
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	0
19 Jun 2025	6	0
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	13
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	9
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	4
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	15
25 Nov 2025	13	10
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	7
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	7
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	7
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	6
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	10
28 Apr 2026	14	12
29 Apr 2026	17	13
30 Apr 2026	11	0
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	7
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	13
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	11
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	15
17 Sept 2026	10	8

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 3 899 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 312 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 3 905 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	99 % of 2 913 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 751 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 198 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 045 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 324 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 321 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 749 shared	89 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	90 % of 4 279 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 4 596 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 691 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	88 % of 4 223 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 322 shared	82 %
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 4 339 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 4 610 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	88 % of 3 843 shared	82 %
Select Moritz KÖRNER	Moritz KÖRNER	Renew	Germany	88 % of 4 716 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	88 % of 3 825 shared	82 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Vice-chair	26 Jun 2025	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	23 Oct 2024	now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assembly	Vice-chair	26 Jun 2025	now
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Jul 2024
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	25 Jun 2025
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	25 Jun 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
1st Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly (in Eswatini)	Official delegation	DPAC	7 May 2026
Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission	Rapporteur	AFCO	28 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	AFCO	24 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	AFCO	10 Feb 2026
Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission	Rapporteur	AFCO	3 Feb 2026
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135)	Rapporteur	AFCO	3 Feb 2026
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135)	Rapporteur	AFCO	20 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	15 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Delegation vice-chair	DPAC	26 Jun 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	13 Jun 2025

Show all 21 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

30 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 48 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Question Time (Commission) - State of play on the European Commission’s pledge to reduce the reporting burden, in particular for SMEs	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate)	Speech · 6 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Presentation of the Better Regulation and Enforcement Communication (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (A10-0025/2026 - Borja Giménez Larraz) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read

Show all 30 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 8

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
20 Jul 2026	Fee differences between classical and accredited European Schools P-10-2026-003057	Priority written question	15 Sept 2026
6 May 2026	Practical feasibility of labelling requirements for secondary and tertiary reusable packaging under Articles 12 and 15(8) PPWR E-10-2026-001856	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	10 Jul 2026
28 Apr 2026	EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges O-10-2026-000020	Oral question	Not yet answered
28 Apr 2026	EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges O-10-2026-000021	Oral question	Not yet answered
31 Mar 2026	Delegated and implementing acts adopted by the Commission P-10-2026-001326	Priority written question	4 Sept 2026
14 Jan 2026	Strengthening Europe’s printed circuit boards & electronics production E-10-2026-000120	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	24 Mar 2026
4 Jun 2025	Impact assessment of Directive (EU) 2024/3019 E-10-2025-002227	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	30 Jul 2025
21 Feb 2025	Flood protection measures versus nature conservation E-10-2025-000813	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	29 Apr 2025

Show all 8 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 10

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790155	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790105	CJ71	1
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784275	CJ40	5
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784309	CJ40	1
12 Feb 2026	Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135) AFCO-AM-784424	AFCO	1
6 Feb 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission AFCO-AM-784243	AFCO	1
12 Dec 2024	2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Parliament AFCO-AM-766887	AFCO	1

Show all 10 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197426?nb=all&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sven SIMON”. Member record. memberId 197426. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197426?nb=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197426. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197426?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197426,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sven SIMON}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197426?nb=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197426?nb=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197426. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197426. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 8

Amendments tabled in committee, 10

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928