Skip to content

Member

Stefan BERGER

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
85.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.7 %ⓘ of 527 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
8 of 490 votesⓘ
Committees
ECON, ITRE (substitute)
Member id
197410
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.0 %

527 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.7 %

515 of 527 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.6 %

8 of 490 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.9 %

5 of 527 votes cast

Participation 85.0 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Stefan BERGER85.0 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 97.7 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Stefan BERGER97.7 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Serbia Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 468 for, 116 against, 79 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Serbia Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 113 for, 514 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Moldova Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 505 for, 115 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Moldova Amendment 7, adding text after recital B 79 for, 576 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Moldova Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 52 102 for, 537 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Moldova Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 51 99 for, 545 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Moldova Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 48 108 for, 535 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 460 for, 136 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 211 for, 425 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 52, adding text after recital Q 160 for, 462 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 3 to recital N 185 for, 453 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 2, adding text after recital M — part 2 164 for, 459 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 2, adding text after recital M — part 1 131 for, 500 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 1, adding text after recital M 185 for, 436 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 51, adding text after recital L — part 1 159 for, 452 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 50, adding text after recital L 130 for, 484 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 49, adding text after recital L 158 for, 459 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 108 104 for, 470 against, 87 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 102 435 for, 178 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Paragraph 101 — part 1 447 for, 130 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 99 527 for, 83 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 83 500 for, 129 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 80 517 for, 106 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 78 498 for, 132 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 71 218 for, 421 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 71 422 for, 164 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 66 222 for, 397 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 65 95 for, 523 against, 38 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Paragraph 62 — part 2 456 for, 144 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 181 for, 411 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 61 191 for, 414 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 60 166 for, 444 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 52 126 for, 506 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 52 143 for, 459 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 41 517 for, 102 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 33 127 for, 469 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 33 — part 1 167 for, 463 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 33 120 for, 481 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 20 to paragraph 33 201 for, 409 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 5 600 for, 11 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 4 478 for, 121 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 3 590 for, 11 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 2 379 for, 229 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 1 592 for, 42 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 190 for, 422 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 31 194 for, 436 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 31 188 for, 438 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 31 202 for, 432 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Amendment 33 to paragraph 30 428 for, 164 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine Paragraph 29 — part 2 426 for, 172 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Axel VOSS EPPGermany99 % of 3 858 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany98 % of 3 129 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany98 % of 4 864 shared89 %
Hildegard BENTELE EPPGermany98 % of 4 423 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 4 116 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany98 % of 4 392 shared89 %
Verena MERTENS EPPGermany98 % of 4 549 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany98 % of 4 474 shared89 %
Marion WALSMANN EPPGermany98 % of 4 801 shared89 %
Lena DÜPONT EPPGermany98 % of 4 039 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia89 % of 4 407 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland88 % of 3 880 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 4 292 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium87 % of 4 759 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands87 % of 3 699 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany87 % of 3 474 shared82 %
Jan-Christoph OETJEN RenewGermany87 % of 4 768 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 3 614 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands87 % of 4 342 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany87 % of 4 843 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 4 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial systemShadow rapporteurECON18 Nov 2025
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Shadow rapporteurECON10 Nov 2025
Non-financial commercial real estate statisticsShadow rapporteurECON10 Jun 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

2 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 4 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Mar 2026European Semester (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2025Collaboration between conservatives and far right as a threat for competitiveness in the EU (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
22 Oct 2024Security-related concerns regarding current EU customs scanning equipment and the Customs Control Equipment Instrument funds E-10-2024-002220Written questionwith 10 co-authors5 Jan 2025
19 Sept 2024Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770Written questionwith 20 co-authors17 Dec 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 18 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Stefan BERGER”. Member record. memberId 197410. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=10&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197410. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197410?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197410,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Stefan BERGER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=10&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=10&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197410. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197410. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}