Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member

Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE

Patriots · Belgium

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Belgium
Roll-call participation
98.6 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
84.2 %ⓘ of 5 824 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
Vlaams Belang
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
378 of 4 640 votesⓘ
Committees
IMCO (substitute), LIBE
Member id
185771
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.6 %

5 845 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+7.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.2 %

4 903 of 5 824 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

8.1 %

378 of 4 640 votes where their group had a clear line

116 opposite (for ↔ against), 208 abstained against the line, 54 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.1 %

646 of 5 845 votes cast

Participation 98.6 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE98.6 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 84.2 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE84.2 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 11 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242321
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249292
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254545
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228228
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251251
3 Apr 20256262
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220219
8 May 2025103101
21 May 202522
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254140
18 Jun 20259191
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134134
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186185
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267266
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125124
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112112
22 Jan 20265857
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263837
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141140
24 Feb 2026430
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197196
11 Mar 20266060
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266968
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225224
29 Apr 2026296295
30 Apr 20266868
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269696
21 May 20269897
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127126
18 Jun 20267777
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144142
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155155
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 2026124124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium99 % of 5 733 shared74 %
Gerolf ANNEMANS PatriotsBelgium98 % of 5 016 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia84 % of 5 345 shared74 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland83 % of 5 142 shared74 %
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal83 % of 4 963 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal82 % of 5 577 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland82 % of 5 335 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia82 % of 3 420 shared74 %
Ton DIEPEVEEN PatriotsNetherlands81 % of 5 391 shared74 %
Sebastiaan STÖTELER Former memberPatriotsNetherlands81 % of 2 157 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance80 % of 5 106 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance79 % of 5 621 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance78 % of 5 015 shared68 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance78 % of 5 280 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance78 % of 4 426 shared70 %
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly77 % of 2 197 shared68 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany76 % of 4 500 shared69 %
René AUST ESNGermany75 % of 5 337 shared70 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany75 % of 4 373 shared70 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany75 % of 5 257 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countriesDMAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working groupMember20 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember11 Mar 2025now
Intergroup on Wine, Quality Foodstuffs and SpiritsIG10-28 Intergroup / working groupMember23 Jan 2025now

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE20 Apr 2026
Establishing the Union support for the Schengen area, for European integrated border management and for the common policy on visas for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurLIBE16 Dec 2025
Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleShadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE15 Apr 2025
EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Shadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE15 Apr 2025
discharge 2023Shadow rapporteurLIBE4 Nov 2024
Proposal for a regulation amending as regards VanuatuShadow rapporteurLIBE1 Oct 2024
Establishing an EU talent poolShadow rapporteurLIBE25 Sept 2024

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 37 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 May 2026Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) Speech · 4 minRead
11 Mar 2026Rise of political violence, notably by far-left organisations (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Feb 2026Order of business Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) SpeechRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
25 Nov 2025Communication on the European Democracy Shield (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Oct 2025Promoting EU digital rules: protecting European sovereignty (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Sept 2025State of the Union (debate) SpeechRead
10 Sept 2025State of the Union (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2025Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 May 2025EU support for a just, sustainable and comprehensive peace in Ukraine (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
11 Mar 2025Presentation of the proposal on a new common approach on returns (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2025Competitiveness Compass (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2025Need to enforce the Digital Services Act to protect democracy on social media platforms including against foreign interference and biased algorithms (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2025Need to enforce the Digital Services Act to protect democracy on social media platforms including against foreign interference and biased algorithms (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Dec 2024Toppling of the Syrian regime, its geopolitical implications and the humanitarian situation in the region (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
27 Nov 2024Presentation by the President-elect of the Commission of the College of Commissioners and its programme (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
13 Nov 2024EU-US relations in light of the outcome of the US presidential elections (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
23 Oct 2024Managing migration in an effective and holistic way through fostering returns (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Oct 2024Presentation of the programme of activities of the Hungarian Presidency (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2024The reintroduction of internal border controls in a number of Member States and its impact on the Schengen Area (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Sept 2024Global measures towards social media platforms - Strengthening the role of DSA and protecting democracy and freedom in the online sphere (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Questions and motions, 58

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
27 Aug 2026The EU’s deadly anti-racism ideology: the death of Henry Nowak E-10-2026-003350Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
16 Jul 2026Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035Written questionwith 42 co-authors11 Sept 2026
16 Jun 2026Use of budgetary headroom for the EUR 90 billion support loan to Ukraine E-10-2026-002470Written question4 Aug 2026
11 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
16 Apr 2026Antifa=Terrorists: zero tolerance for political violence in Europe E-10-2026-001569Written questionwith 28 co-authors15 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-funded media attacking Christian symbols while applying double standards B-10-2026-0184Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
10 Apr 2026EU budget and equality policy – promoting LGBTQ projects over family policy E-10-2026-001469Written questionwith 22 co-authors30 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410Written questionwith 25 co-authors18 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026De facto mandatory nature of the codes of conduct on disinformation and hate speech E-10-2026-001432Written questionwith 23 co-authors15 Jun 2026
19 Mar 2026Use of the ‘borderline content’ handbook promoted at the EU Internet Forum for moderating lawful political speech E-10-2026-001160Written questionwith 31 co-authors19 May 2026
6 Mar 2026EU Legal Gateway and its connection to the issuance of Schengen visas E-10-2026-000939Written questionwith 1 co-author22 May 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
5 Mar 2026Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923Written questionwith 37 co-authors4 May 2026
18 Feb 2026Sign language accessibility in EU disability rights consultation 2025–2026 E-10-2026-000693Written questionwith 4 co-authors27 May 2026
12 Feb 2026New EU-India agreement: more immigration, less control and risks to internal security? E-10-2026-000617Written questionwith 7 co-authors24 Apr 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
29 Dec 2025Penalties based on the Digital Services Act against the platform X P-10-2025-005077Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors17 Feb 2026
19 Dec 2025Multi-million euro fine against X to enforce the EU censorship agenda under the guise of alleged violations of transparency obligations under the DSA O-10-2025-000047Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Dec 2025Expansion of Erasmus and the rule of law E-10-2025-004957Written questionwith 22 co-authors26 Feb 2026
1 Dec 2025Pricing and seating policy for young children on EU flights E-10-2025-004743Written questionwith 11 co-authors24 Feb 2026
26 Nov 2025Assessment of Antifa Ost (‘Hammerbande’) as a structured terrorist organisation E-10-2025-004707Written questionwith 20 co-authorsNot yet answered
24 Nov 2025Fake asylum seekers: the EU is held hostage by a legal interpretation that opens the gates to illegal immigration and the collapse of its borders E-10-2025-004673Written questionwith 31 co-authors6 Feb 2026
20 Nov 2025Manipulation of the Erasmus+ programme as a new channel for immigration and exclusion of Hungarian universities from the programme O-10-2025-000043Oral questionwith 59 co-authorsNot yet answered
13 Nov 2025EU subsidies for organisations linked to Islamist networks E-10-2025-004519Written question28 Jan 2026
13 Nov 2025EU guidelines and the influencing of AI chatbots E-10-2025-004520Written question15 Jan 2026
22 Oct 2025Unacceptable reference to gender self-identification ‘without age restrictions’ in the EU LGBTIQ+ equality strategy for 2026-2030 E-10-2025-004172Written questionwith 46 co-authors6 Jan 2026
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 8 July 2025 supplementing Directive (EU) 2024/1788 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels B-10-2025-0464Motion for a resolutionwith 48 co-authors—
14 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors—
23 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal murders of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska and US political activist Charlie Kirk, and the need to defend vulnerable individuals and uphold law and order B-10-2025-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 82 co-authors—
18 Sept 2025Classification of political expressions and satire under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-003616Written questionwith 39 co-authors18 Nov 2025
17 Sept 2025GPS interference on the flight of Commission President von der Leyen – media disinformation and distorted facts O-10-2025-000030Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
10 Sept 2025Commission steamrolling ahead with Mercosur agreement O-10-2025-000027Oral questionwith 41 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Jul 2025Scrapping of the Canadian digital tax and US pressure E-10-2025-002829Written question29 Sept 2025
10 Jul 2025Age verification when accessing pornographic material within the EU E-10-2025-002830Written question5 Sept 2025
12 Jun 2025The ‘EU Talent Pool’ as a new open door for mass migration E-10-2025-002371Written questionwith 26 co-authors10 Sept 2025
27 May 2025Digital censorship and content removal by Meta in the EU E-10-2025-002118Written question7 Aug 2025
23 Apr 2025Anti-white racism and Christianophobia: the forgotten victims of the EU’s strategy against racism E-10-2025-001643Written questionwith 14 co-authors25 Jun 2025
2 Apr 2025Implementation and regulatory considerations for the European Disability and Parking Cards Directive E-10-2025-001342Written questionwith 5 co-authors3 Jun 2025
1 Apr 2025Commission’s response to the impact of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) on the competitiveness of EU businesses E-10-2025-001325Written questionwith 19 co-authors13 May 2025
31 Mar 2025EUR 4.4 billion from the Global Gateway for projects in South Africa and the silence about racial hatred E-10-2025-001321Written questionwith 11 co-authors27 May 2025
11 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on implementing a mass return strategy to expel illegal migrants B-10-2025-0137Motion for a resolutionwith 36 co-authors—
5 Feb 2025EU multilingualism in light of the principle of equality and non-discrimination E-10-2025-000499Written questionwith 5 co-authors24 Apr 2025
29 Jan 2025Lack of transparency, misuse of public funds and assurance of sound management in European institutions E-10-2025-000405Written questionwith 38 co-authors25 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025Doubling of the size of the Digital Services Regulation compliance team E-10-2025-000406Written question31 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025The Commission’s response to the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000403Written questionwith 36 co-authors24 Mar 2025
6 Dec 2024Protection of European maritime interests in the Red Sea E-10-2024-002807Written questionwith 10 co-authors10 Feb 2025
5 Dec 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Dismantling Overregulation and Government Encroachment: reclaiming competitiveness and innovation in the European Union B-10-2024-0214Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
25 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on election of the Commission B-10-2024-0196Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
22 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the victory of president-elect Donald Trump B-10-2024-0185Motion for a resolutionwith 44 co-authors—
11 Oct 2024Housing crisis in the EU – urgent need to repeal Directive 2024/1275 on the energy performance of buildings E-10-2024-002029Written questionwith 54 co-authors27 Nov 2024
10 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors—
8 Oct 2024Compensation for President von der Leyen’s special adviser E-10-2024-001991Written questionwith 15 co-authors9 Jan 2025
25 Sept 2024Commission enquiry into Meta’s shadow bans E-10-2024-001816Written question15 Nov 2024
23 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the surge in the number of sub-Saharan migrants B-10-2024-0065Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
26 Jul 2024Transparency concerning plans for a European asset registry E-10-2024-001435Written question11 Sept 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 23

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
1 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) LIBE-AM-790741 LIBE27
15 Dec 2025The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025 LIBE-AM-781446 LIBE60
17 Nov 2025Public access to documents – report covering the years 2022 - 2024 LIBE-AM-779637 LIBE12
6 Nov 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept LIBE-AM-779510 LIBE12
27 Oct 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level LIBE-AM-779328 LIBE23
20 Oct 2025Impact of social media and the online environment on young people LIBE-AM-779286 LIBE19
1 Oct 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 AFET-AM-778129 AFET1
26 Sept 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime LIBE-AM-778053 LIBE42
16 Jun 2025Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement LIBE-AM-773389 LIBE17
23 May 2025EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 LIBE-AM-774227 LIBE7

Show all 23 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Belgium National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/185771?docs=all&speeches=all&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE”. Member record. memberId 185771. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/185771?docs=all&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/185771. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/185771?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-185771,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/185771?docs=all&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/185771?docs=all&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 185771. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/185771. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}