Member

Elio DI RUPO

S&D · Belgium

Group: S&D
Country: Belgium
Roll-call participation: 89.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 94.4 %ⓘ of 557 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: PS Parti Socialiste
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 29 of 550 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, LIBE (substitute), SEDE
Member id: 1294

National party: PS Parti Socialiste
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 29 of 550 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, LIBE (substitute), SEDE
Member id: 1294

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

89.8 %

557 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+0.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.4 %

526 of 557 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−2.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

5.3 %

29 of 550 votes where their group had a clear line

16 opposite (for ↔ against), 13 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.7 %

15 of 557 votes cast

Participation 89.8 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Elio DI RUPO	89.8 %
S&D median	89.5 %
Lowest in the group	48.1 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	137

With majority line 94.4 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Elio DI RUPO	94.4 %
S&D median	97.1 %
Lowest in the group	86.7 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	137

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	0
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	0
12 Feb 2025	4	0
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	6
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	6
2 Apr 2025	9	8
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	3
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	0
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	0
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	7
22 Jan 2026	8	0
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	11
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	13
29 Apr 2026	17	16
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	14
8 Jul 2026	15	13
9 Jul 2026	4	0
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Estelle CEULEMANS	Estelle CEULEMANS	S&D	Belgium	91 % of 5 000 shared	93 %
Select Antonio DECARO	Antonio DECARO Former member	S&D	Italy	90 % of 2 056 shared	93 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	90 % of 5 009 shared	93 %
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 427 shared	93 %
Select Kathleen VAN BREMPT	Kathleen VAN BREMPT	S&D	Belgium	90 % of 5 061 shared	93 %
Select Marc ANGEL	Marc ANGEL	S&D	Luxembourg	90 % of 5 189 shared	93 %
Select Günther SIDL	Günther SIDL	S&D	Austria	90 % of 4 897 shared	93 %
Select Irene TINAGLI	Irene TINAGLI	S&D	Italy	90 % of 5 169 shared	93 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	90 % of 4 473 shared	93 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 882 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	Greens	France	86 % of 4 533 shared	83 %
Select Vladimir PREBILIČ	Vladimir PREBILIČ	Greens	Slovenia	86 % of 4 585 shared	83 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 4 009 shared	86 %
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	85 % of 1 583 shared	86 %
Select Irena JOVEVA	Irena JOVEVA	Renew	Slovenia	84 % of 5 131 shared	86 %
Select Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Kim VAN SPARRENTAK	Greens	Netherlands	84 % of 5 099 shared	83 %
Select Catarina VIEIRA	Catarina VIEIRA	Greens	Netherlands	84 % of 4 887 shared	83 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	84 % of 4 955 shared	83 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	84 % of 4 353 shared	83 %
Select Pär HOLMGREN	Pär HOLMGREN	Greens	Sweden	84 % of 5 142 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary CommitteesDMAG Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working group	Member	25 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 16 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Situation of international law and the risks to multilateralism, democracy and the European Union	Rapporteur	AFET	19 May 2026
Mission to Brazil 6-8 May 2026	Official delegation	D-BR	7 Apr 2026
Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	23 Feb 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	SEDE	23 Feb 2026
Military mobility	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	10 Sept 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	SEDE	21 May 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFET	17 Mar 2025
Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CFSP/CSDP) in Warsaw from 23 to 25 March 2025	Official delegation		12 Feb 2025
AFET draft report on the 2023-2024 Commission Reports on Kosovo, 2025/2019(INI).	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	28 Jan 2025
AFET opinion on providing MFA to Egypte	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	21 Nov 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 27 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
11 Mar 2026	EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Violence in the Great Lakes Region, particularly in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	EU Defence Readiness (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Oct 2025	Allegations of espionage by the Hungarian government within the EU institutions (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Oct 2025	Request for waiver of immunity	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	This is Europe - Debate with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Luc Frieden (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 51

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	Circular Economy Act: regulatory barriers to secondary raw materials E-10-2026-003654	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	Not yet answered
9 Sept 2026	European defence readiness by 2030 E-10-2026-003595	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
30 Jun 2026	Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026	Request that the Commission publish evidence pertaining to the non-activation of the Blocking Statute E-10-2026-002520	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	Not yet answered
11 Jun 2026	Small modular reactors E-10-2026-002408	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	20 Aug 2026
8 Jun 2026	Access to Temporary Protection Directive provisions in Belgium for babies born after 24 February 2022 E-10-2026-002349	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	31 Aug 2026
6 May 2026	European capacity for AI-driven large-scale vulnerability research and cybersecurity resilience E-10-2026-001844	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	12 Aug 2026
6 May 2026	European regulatory gap regarding offensive AI capabilities E-10-2026-001843	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	7 Jul 2026

Show all 51 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
15 Jun 2026	A new co-ownership for the future of Euro-Mediterranean relations – the Pact for the Mediterranean AFET-AM-789979	AFET	26
11 Jun 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure SEDE-AM-789927	SEDE	114
13 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Kosovo AFET-AM-785346	AFET	18
10 Apr 2026	Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786977	CJ57	54
10 Apr 2026	Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975	CJ57	35
10 Apr 2026	Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786976	CJ57	37
10 Apr 2026	Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786978	CJ57	21
6 Mar 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 SEDE-AM-785215	SEDE	34
26 Feb 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities SEDE-AM-785200	SEDE	88
2 Feb 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 SEDE-AM-784153	SEDE	13

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Belgium National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Elio DI RUPO”. Member record. memberId 1294. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/1294. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/1294?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-1294,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Elio DI RUPO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 1294. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/1294. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 51

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928