Skip to content

Member

Elio DI RUPO

S&D · Belgium

Group
S&D
Country
Belgium
Roll-call participation
89.9 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
90.2 %ⓘ of 5 326 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %
More facts (5)
National party
PS Parti Socialiste
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
482 of 5 240 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, LIBE (substitute), SEDE
Member id
1294
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

89.9 %

5 328 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (±0.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.2 %

4 803 of 5 326 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (−6.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.2 %

482 of 5 240 votes where their group had a clear line

354 opposite (for ↔ against), 90 abstained against the line, 38 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.4 %

127 of 5 328 votes cast

Participation 89.9 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Elio DI RUPO89.9 %
S&D median89.9 %
Lowest in the group30.4 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members138
With majority line 90.2 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Elio DI RUPO90.2 %
S&D median96.3 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members138
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 343 for, 247 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 338 for, 261 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 201 for, 390 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 280 for, 292 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 200 for, 397 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 437 for, 82 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 231 for, 350 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 272 for, 256 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 124 for, 428 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 427 for, 156 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 267 for, 332 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 194 for, 399 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 136 for, 423 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 92 for, 488 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 203 for, 390 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2 524 for, 75 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1 596 for, 8 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 427 for, 149 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 111 for, 439 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2 435 for, 127 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H 200 for, 406 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 344 for, 201 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 378 for, 202 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 195 for, 403 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22 186 for, 408 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 207 for, 397 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2 512 for, 86 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1 602 for, 8 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 210 for, 396 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 210 for, 395 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 347 for, 202 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 381 for, 202 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 181 for, 424 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 196 for, 411 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 344 for, 256 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 213 for, 394 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G 141 for, 462 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22 452 for, 119 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20 480 for, 116 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3 582 for, 10 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2 275 for, 270 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1 490 for, 120 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12 475 for, 121 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4 478 for, 126 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3 489 for, 116 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2 479 for, 124 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3 474 for, 126 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2 499 for, 95 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242317
18 Jul 202410
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249287
7 Oct 202421
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129127
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202421
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245755
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202510
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254544
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 2025320
12 Feb 2025100
13 Feb 2025300
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202598
12 Mar 2025228218
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253534
2 Apr 2025251243
3 Apr 20256262
5 May 202555
6 May 2025109
7 May 2025220215
8 May 2025103103
21 May 202520
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254139
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258786
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134127
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255554
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186183
23 Oct 20255553
13 Nov 2025267260
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510099
27 Nov 20251250
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256665
17 Dec 20254342
18 Dec 2025420
20 Jan 20266766
21 Jan 2026112111
22 Jan 2026580
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141140
24 Feb 20264341
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197195
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225218
29 Apr 2026296288
30 Apr 20266868
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269696
21 May 2026980
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264039
17 Jun 2026127124
18 Jun 20267775
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267270
8 Jul 2026144135
9 Jul 2026670
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155155
16 Sept 20268077
17 Sept 2026124123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Estelle CEULEMANS S&DBelgium91 % of 5 000 shared93 %
Antonio DECARO Former memberS&DItaly90 % of 2 056 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain90 % of 5 009 shared93 %
Francisco ASSIS S&DPortugal90 % of 4 427 shared93 %
Kathleen VAN BREMPT S&DBelgium90 % of 5 061 shared93 %
Marc ANGEL S&DLuxembourg90 % of 5 189 shared93 %
Günther SIDL S&DAustria90 % of 4 897 shared93 %
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly90 % of 5 169 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany90 % of 4 473 shared93 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal90 % of 4 882 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Mélissa CAMARA GreensFrance86 % of 4 533 shared83 %
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia86 % of 4 585 shared83 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium85 % of 4 009 shared86 %
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly85 % of 1 583 shared86 %
Irena JOVEVA RenewSlovenia84 % of 5 131 shared86 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands84 % of 5 099 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands84 % of 4 887 shared83 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany84 % of 4 955 shared83 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands84 % of 4 353 shared83 %
Pär HOLMGREN GreensSweden84 % of 5 142 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union, including the EU-Morocco, EU-Tunisia and EU-Algeria Joint Parliamentary CommitteesDMAG DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working groupMember25 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 16 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Situation of international law and the risks to multilateralism, democracy and the European UnionRapporteurAFET19 May 2026
Mission to Brazil 6-8 May 2026Official delegationD-BR7 Apr 2026
Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the UnionShadow rapporteurSEDE23 Feb 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153Shadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE23 Feb 2026
Military mobilityShadow rapporteurSEDE10 Sept 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challengesShadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE21 May 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET17 Mar 2025
Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CFSP/CSDP) in Warsaw from 23 to 25 March 2025Official delegation12 Feb 2025
AFET draft report on the 2023-2024 Commission Reports on Kosovo, 2025/2019(INI).Shadow rapporteurAFET28 Jan 2025
AFET opinion on providing MFA to EgypteShadow rapporteurAFET21 Nov 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 27 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
11 Mar 2026EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Violence in the Great Lakes Region, particularly in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Dec 2025EU Defence Readiness (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Oct 2025Allegations of espionage by the Hungarian government within the EU institutions (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Oct 2025Request for waiver of immunity Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2025This is Europe - Debate with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Luc Frieden (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 51

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026Circular Economy Act: regulatory barriers to secondary raw materials E-10-2026-003654Written questionwith 29 co-authorsNot yet answered
9 Sept 2026European defence readiness by 2030 E-10-2026-003595Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
30 Jun 2026Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698Written questionwith 43 co-authors18 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026Request that the Commission publish evidence pertaining to the non-activation of the Blocking Statute E-10-2026-002520Written questionwith 31 co-authorsNot yet answered
11 Jun 2026Small modular reactors E-10-2026-002408Written questionwith 25 co-authors20 Aug 2026
8 Jun 2026Access to Temporary Protection Directive provisions in Belgium for babies born after 24 February 2022 E-10-2026-002349Written questionwith 6 co-authors31 Aug 2026
6 May 2026European capacity for AI-driven large-scale vulnerability research and cybersecurity resilience E-10-2026-001844Written questionwith 3 co-authors12 Aug 2026
6 May 2026European regulatory gap regarding offensive AI capabilities E-10-2026-001843Written questionwith 3 co-authors7 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705Written questionwith 49 co-authors14 Jul 2026
21 Apr 2026Customs practices related to products imported from illegal Israeli settlements in the OPTs E-10-2026-001633Written questionwith 71 co-authors16 Jul 2026
17 Apr 2026Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019Oral questionwith 53 co-authorsNot yet answered
26 Mar 2026Continued EU political and financial support to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) P-10-2026-001277Priority written questionwith 27 co-authors6 May 2026
20 Mar 2026Transfer of European citizens’ biometric data to the Trump administration O-10-2026-000015Oral questionwith 48 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Mar 2026Situation in Sudan E-10-2026-001036Written questionwith 13 co-authors30 Apr 2026
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Mar 2026German Bundeskartellamt inquiry into Amazon pricing practices E-10-2026-000989Written questionwith 24 co-authors5 May 2026
24 Feb 2026Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756Written questionwith 17 co-authors29 Apr 2026
19 Feb 2026The European Parliament’s call to trigger the blocking statute to protect and safeguard the International Criminal Court E-10-2026-000718Written questionwith 54 co-authors13 May 2026
12 Feb 2026EU intervention following the severe environmental disaster caused by Cyclone Harry in southern Italy E-10-2026-000629Written questionwith 23 co-authors4 May 2026
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026
22 Jan 2026AI companion chatbots: protecting minors under EU law E-10-2026-000256Written questionwith 27 co-authors18 Mar 2026
21 Jan 2026Police raid on LGBT persons in Baku and Azerbaijan’s human rights obligations towards the EU E-10-2026-000215Written questionwith 12 co-authors5 May 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
9 Dec 2025Participation of Israel in the Horizon Europe programme E-10-2025-004869Written questionwith 43 co-authors7 Apr 2026
12 Nov 2025Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Jan 2026
22 Oct 2025The ongoing disinformation campaign targeting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees in the Near East and the EU’s support to the agency E-10-2025-004158Written questionwith 41 co-authors25 Mar 2026
22 Oct 2025Delay in reporting by the Commission E-10-2025-004164Written questionwith 7 co-authors13 Jan 2026
17 Oct 2025Accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza E-10-2025-004109Written questionwith 47 co-authors13 Jan 2026
6 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure B-10-2025-0437Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
17 Jul 2025Humanitarian aid in Gaza and occupied West Bank and possibility of suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement E-10-2025-002981Written questionwith 30 co-authors2 Oct 2025
16 Jun 2025Protection of Hungarian citizens’ fundamental rights in the context of biometric identification and surveillance at public gatherings E-10-2025-002415Written questionwith 59 co-authors1 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025US decision to suspend student visas and social media screening E-10-2025-002295Written questionwith 45 co-authors12 Aug 2025
2 Jun 2025Access for humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip E-10-2025-002193Written questionwith 21 co-authors4 Aug 2025
6 May 2025Adoption of targeted sanctions against military individuals responsible for lethal attacks on civilians and other serious human rights violations in Sudan E-10-2025-001817Written questionwith 19 co-authors16 Jun 2025
23 Apr 2025Acquisition of X by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence start-up xAI E-10-2025-001615Written questionwith 42 co-authors14 Jul 2025
7 Apr 2025Taxation of big digital tech companies E-10-2025-001409Written questionwith 38 co-authors17 Jul 2025
2 Apr 2025Abolition of seasonal clock changes in the EU and follow-up actions by the Commission E-10-2025-001369Written questionwith 22 co-authors28 Jul 2025
25 Mar 2025Draft 15th amendment to the Hungarian Constitution E-10-2025-001233Written questionwith 32 co-authors23 Jul 2025
18 Mar 2025Withdrawal of the proposed horizontal anti-discrimination directive P-10-2025-001148Priority written questionwith 46 co-authors24 Jul 2025
28 Feb 2025Action plan on rare diseases E-10-2025-000886Written questionwith 33 co-authors26 Jun 2025
25 Feb 2025Countering Russian influence and defending democracy in Georgia E-10-2025-000837Written questionwith 38 co-authors3 Apr 2025
21 Feb 2025Commission’s response to the incomplete implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Member States E-10-2025-000810Written questionwith 50 co-authors27 May 2025
20 Jan 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in Democratic Republic of Congo B-10-2025-0069Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
17 Jan 2025Actual or foreseeable negative effects of Elon Musk’s statements on civic discourse, electoral processes and freedom and pluralism of the media under the DSA E-10-2025-000191Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Mar 2025
14 Jan 2025Request for urgent action concerning the inclusion of announced US sanctions against the ICC in the annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 (Blocking Statute) P-10-2025-000121Priority written questionwith 29 co-authors10 Feb 2025
26 Nov 2024Conflicts of interest and political interference by Elon Musk E-10-2024-002653Written questionwith 29 co-authors20 Feb 2025
21 Nov 2024Change of algorithm on X before US election P-10-2024-002623Priority written questionwith 41 co-authors12 Feb 2025
24 Sept 2024Human rights violations by EU-funded forces in Tunisia E-10-2024-001795Written questionwith 48 co-authors12 Mar 2025
19 Aug 2024Restructuring at Audi in Brussels E-10-2024-001518Written questionwith 3 co-authors31 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
15 Jun 2026A new co-ownership for the future of Euro-Mediterranean relations – the Pact for the Mediterranean AFET-AM-789979 AFET26
11 Jun 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure SEDE-AM-789927 SEDE114
13 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Kosovo AFET-AM-785346 AFET18
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786977 CJ5754
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975 CJ5735
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786976 CJ5737
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786978 CJ5721
6 Mar 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 SEDE-AM-785215 SEDE34
26 Feb 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities SEDE-AM-785200 SEDE88
2 Feb 2026Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 SEDE-AM-784153 SEDE13

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Belgium National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Elio DI RUPO”. Member record. memberId 1294. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?docs=all&page=2&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/1294. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/1294?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-1294,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Elio DI RUPO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?docs=all&page=2&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1294?docs=all&page=2&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 1294. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/1294. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}