Member

Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI

EPP · Poland

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 99.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 90.7 %ⓘ of 614 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 21 of 572 votesⓘ
Committees: CULT (vice-chair), INTA
Member id: 124893

National party: KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 21 of 572 votesⓘ
Committees: CULT (vice-chair), INTA
Member id: 124893

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.0 %

614 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+8.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.7 %

557 of 614 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−4.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.7 %

21 of 572 votes where their group had a clear line

7 opposite (for ↔ against), 14 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

5.7 %

35 of 614 votes cast

Participation 99.0 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI	99.0 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 90.7 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI	90.7 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	11
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	10
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	8
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	8

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Andrzej BUŁA	Andrzej BUŁA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 351 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej HALICKI	Andrzej HALICKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 360 shared	89 %
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 421 shared	89 %
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 776 shared	89 %
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 222 shared	89 %
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 490 shared	89 %
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 484 shared	89 %
Select Borys BUDKA	Borys BUDKA	EPP	Poland	96 % of 4 980 shared	89 %
Select Jacek PROTAS	Jacek PROTAS	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 562 shared	89 %
Select Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ	Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZ	EPP	Poland	95 % of 5 713 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	83 % of 5 236 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	83 % of 4 231 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	83 % of 5 140 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	82 % of 4 474 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	82 % of 4 611 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	82 % of 5 658 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	82 % of 4 411 shared	82 %
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Renew	Netherlands	82 % of 5 127 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	82 % of 3 570 shared	75 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	81 % of 4 050 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT Committee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Jul 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	CULT	24 Sept 2026
European Capitals of Culture 2034–2047	Shadow rapporteur	CULT	22 Sept 2026
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures applicable to Armenian products	Rapporteur	INTA	13 Jul 2026
Participation in the First Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly, scheduled for 12-14 May 2026, in Ezulwini (Eswatini).	Official delegation	DAFR	27 Apr 2026
Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the Union and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	14 Apr 2026
Participation in the First Ordinary Plenary Caribbean-EU Parliamentary Assembly as the very active ACP full member.\n16-18 February 2026 St Johns, Antigua and Barbuda\n	Official delegation	DACP	30 Jan 2026
Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888	Rapporteur	CULT	4 Nov 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2016/1036, (EU) 2016/1037, (EU) 2017/1129, (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/573 as regards the extension of certain mitigating measures available for small and medium sized enterprises to small mid-cap enterprises and further simplification measures	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	INTA	2 Oct 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	DACP	1 Sept 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	CULT	9 Apr 2025

Show all 15 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 38 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
18 Jun 2026	Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 May 2026	Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	International Day of Education, fighting inequalities in access to education (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Online piracy of sports and other live events: urgent need to address unsolved issues (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
23 Oct 2025	Audiovisual Media Services Directive obligations in the transatlantic dialogue (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Oct 2025	Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
6 Oct 2025	Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model (debate)	Speech · 5 min	Read
11 Sept 2025	A new vision for the European Universities alliances (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 32

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
17 Jul 2026	Commission funding for Euronews and compatibility with the European Media Freedom Act E-10-2026-003044	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
13 Jul 2026	Missing and runaway children as an indicator of violence, abuse and grooming E-10-2026-002868	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	Not yet answered
29 Jun 2026	Protecting minors online from manipulation, bullying and grooming E-10-2026-002680	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
24 Jun 2026	Deterioration in the situation of European industry as regards ferro-alloys and silicon metal, which are of recognised strategic importance for the European Union’s economic security E-10-2026-002593	Written question	1 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026	Recognition of obesity as a chronic disease under EU public health policy E-10-2026-002516	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	24 Aug 2026
9 Jun 2026	Chinese tomato concentrate imports: protecting EU producers and food security P-10-2026-002375	Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors	13 Jul 2026
2 Jun 2026	Streaming fraud E-10-2026-002243	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	31 Jul 2026
6 May 2026	Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	3 Jul 2026
31 Mar 2026	Dynamic pricing, competition concerns and consumer protection in FIFA World Cup 2026 ticket sales E-10-2026-001336	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	9 Jun 2026
26 Mar 2026	Urgent disbursement of EU financial support related to Ukraine E-10-2026-001268	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	29 Jul 2026
25 Mar 2026	Ensuring competition and strategic autonomy in the AI gigafactory supply chain E-10-2026-001255	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	19 Jun 2026
24 Feb 2026	Ensuring risk assessment as the basis for proportionate regulation of cosmetic products E-10-2026-000762	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	16 Apr 2026
18 Feb 2026	Inspections to ensure regulatory conformity of cosmetic products in the single market with the Cosmetic Products Regulation E-10-2026-000687	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	Not yet answered
18 Feb 2026	Checks on the presence of prohibited substances and trace impurities in non-EU cosmetic products entering the single market E-10-2026-000688	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	21 May 2026
9 Feb 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on World Cancer Day B-10-2026-0141	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
18 Dec 2025	Copyright and related rights licensing of French repertoire for AI use E-10-2025-005023	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	20 Feb 2026
26 Nov 2025	Possible infringement of European Union environmental legislation in relation to the ‘Hel Happiness’ development project E-10-2025-004699	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	28 Jan 2026
19 Nov 2025	Potential inclusion of Pernambuco in Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Appendix I and safeguarding European cultural heritage E-10-2025-004606	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	21 Jan 2026
17 Nov 2025	COP20 CITES – Pernambuco wood E-10-2025-004576	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	10 Mar 2026
29 Oct 2025	Safeguarding the European ferroalloy sector E-10-2025-004242	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	19 Dec 2025
22 Jul 2025	Reassessing the timetable and safeguards for ETS2: preventing price shocks and ensuring social readiness E-10-2025-003032	Written questionwith 48 co-authors	12 Nov 2025
13 Jun 2025	Clarification of whether the principle of reciprocity is consistent with EU law E-10-2025-002400	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	30 Jul 2025
12 Apr 2025	Combating online piracy of live events close to two years after the recommendation’s adoption E-10-2025-001512	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	28 May 2025
28 Mar 2025	Europe’s industrial and mobile heritage E-10-2025-001309	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	3 Jun 2025
25 Feb 2025	Countering Russian influence and defending democracy in Georgia E-10-2025-000837	Written questionwith 38 co-authors	3 Apr 2025
20 Feb 2025	The modernisation of the High-Mountain Meteorological Observatory on Mount Śnieżka E-10-2025-000775	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	27 Mar 2025
17 Feb 2025	EU-Mercosur trade agreement E-10-2025-000716	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	24 Apr 2025
9 Dec 2024	EU-Mercosur agreement E-10-2024-002829	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	3 Mar 2025
20 Nov 2024	Erasmus+ programme and IT tools E-10-2024-002603	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	15 Jan 2025
16 Oct 2024	Fund for the protection and development of the frontier regions of countries bordering Ukraine, Belarus and Russia E-10-2024-002090	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	10 Jan 2025
17 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0057	Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors	—
17 Jul 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007	Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 34

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062	CJ65	21
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061	CJ65	15
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057	CJ65	20
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058	CJ65	7
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059	CJ65	27
12 Jun 2026	Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789967	CULT	1
12 Jun 2026	Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789899	CULT	6
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788899	ITRE	1
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788891	ITRE	1
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896	ITRE	1

Show all 34 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124893?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI”. Member record. memberId 124893. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124893?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124893. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124893?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124893,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124893?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124893?docs=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124893. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124893. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 32

Amendments tabled in committee, 34

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928