Member

Dario TAMBURRANO

The Left · Italy

Group: The Left
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 92.7 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 85.6 %ⓘ of 569 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 86.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: M5S Movimento 5 Stelle
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 33 of 473 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE, SANT, TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 124813

National party: M5S Movimento 5 Stelle
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 33 of 473 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE, SANT, TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 124813

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.7 %

575 of 620 final votes while in office

The Left median: 86.9 % (+5.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

85.6 %

487 of 569 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 86.6 % (−1.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.0 %

33 of 473 votes where their group had a clear line

14 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

15.0 %

86 of 575 votes cast

Participation 92.7 % — The Left median 86.9 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Dario TAMBURRANO	92.7 %
The Left median	86.9 %
Lowest in the group	37.7 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	47

With majority line 85.6 % — The Left median 86.6 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Dario TAMBURRANO	85.6 %
The Left median	86.6 %
Lowest in the group	64.5 %
Highest in the group	91.8 %
Members	47

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	4
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	4
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	1
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	3
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	3
7 May 2025	20	19
8 May 2025	12	11
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	9
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	15
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	5
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	0
11 Feb 2026	10	0
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	15
30 Apr 2026	11	9
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	8
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Valentina PALMISANO	Valentina PALMISANO	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 426 shared	87 %
Select Carolina MORACE	Carolina MORACE	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 433 shared	87 %
Select Giuseppe ANTOCI	Giuseppe ANTOCI	The Left	Italy	99 % of 4 871 shared	87 %
Select Gaetano PEDULLA'	Gaetano PEDULLA'	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 341 shared	87 %
Select Pasquale TRIDICO	Pasquale TRIDICO	The Left	Italy	99 % of 5 113 shared	87 %
Select Danilo DELLA VALLE	Danilo DELLA VALLE	The Left	Italy	98 % of 5 383 shared	87 %
Select Mario FURORE	Mario FURORE	The Left	Italy	98 % of 4 958 shared	87 %
Select Martin GÜNTHER	Martin GÜNTHER	The Left	Germany	90 % of 2 688 shared	87 %
Select Elena KOUNTOURA	Elena KOUNTOURA	The Left	Greece	89 % of 3 817 shared	87 %
Select Rudi KENNES	Rudi KENNES	The Left	Belgium	88 % of 5 462 shared	87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Greens	Spain	81 % of 4 483 shared	77 %
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Greens	Spain	79 % of 5 048 shared	77 %
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Greens	Italy	79 % of 4 640 shared	77 %
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Greens	Italy	79 % of 5 303 shared	77 %
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Greens	Italy	78 % of 4 998 shared	77 %
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	Greens	France	77 % of 5 359 shared	77 %
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Greens	Belgium	77 % of 5 191 shared	77 %
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Greens	Spain	77 % of 4 472 shared	77 %
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	Greens	France	77 % of 5 277 shared	77 %
Select Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Ignazio Roberto MARINO	Greens	Italy	77 % of 4 170 shared	77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group	Member	24 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working group	Member	12 Mar 2025	now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working group	Member	30 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working group	Member	8 Jan 2025	now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Clean corporate vehicles	Shadow rapporteur	TRAN	14 Apr 2026
Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	27 Feb 2026
Amending Regulation (EU)2017/1938 as regards the role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	24 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	15 Jan 2025

Show all 4 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

26 contributions recorded; 16 on behalf of their group; 34 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Electrification Action Plan (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Presentation of the Energy Package (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 Oct 2025	A new legislative framework for products that is fit for the digital and sustainable transition (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	Europe’s automotive future – reversing the ban on the sale of combustion cars in the EU (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 26 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 142

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	Circular Economy Act: regulatory barriers to secondary raw materials E-10-2026-003654	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	US interference, protection of digital rights and countering extraterritorial sanctions in the Autistici/Inventati case E-10-2026-003612	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
29 Jul 2026	The Salone biodigester in Colle Monfortani (Province of Rome) and the DNSH principle E-10-2026-003169	Written question	23 Sept 2026
22 Jul 2026	Transposition of the Anti-SLAPP Directive in Italy P-10-2026-003070	Priority written questionwith 2 co-authors	28 Aug 2026
9 Jul 2026	The incinerator in Rome and safeguarding drinking water resources E-10-2026-002853	Written questionwith 1 co-author	2 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026	Transparency regarding EU-funded infrastructure destroyed in Gaza E-10-2026-002805	Written questionwith 39 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026	RAI’s independence and financial viability in Europe’s pluralistic media landscape E-10-2026-002809	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026	PFAS contamination in food and lack of monitoring by the Veneto Region E-10-2026-002786	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
29 Jun 2026	Potential clash between RED II and Italy’s rules governing incentives for renewable energy communities E-10-2026-002673	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	26 Aug 2026

Show all 142 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 41

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791072	CJ72	3
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-786820	CJ72	1
15 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections SANT-AM-789117	SANT	7
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955	AGRI	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899	AGRI	1
10 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/631 as regards CO2 emission performance standards for new light duty vehicles and vehicle labelling and repealing Directive 1999/94/EC ENVI-AM-789913	ENVI	1
1 Jul 2026	Connecting Europe through high-speed rail TRAN-AM-790790	TRAN	6
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-790087	CJ46	8

Show all 41 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) The Left · Left · democratic socialism, communism

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124813?scope=final&seats=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dario TAMBURRANO”. Member record. memberId 124813. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124813?scope=final&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124813. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124813?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124813,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dario TAMBURRANO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124813?scope=final&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124813?scope=final&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124813. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124813. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within The Left

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 142

Amendments tabled in committee, 41

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928