Skip to content

Member

Dan NICA

S&D · Romania

Group
S&D
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
62.0 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line
95.9 %ⓘ of 1 562 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 95.8 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
55 of 1 530 votesⓘ
Committees
ENVI (substitute), ITRE
Member id
124784
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

62.0 %

1 562 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.1 % (−28.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.9 %

1 498 of 1 562 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 95.8 % (+0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.6 %

55 of 1 530 votes where their group had a clear line

39 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 9 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.0 %

15 of 1 562 votes cast

Participation 62.0 % — S&D median 90.1 %, 135 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Dan NICA62.0 %
S&D median90.1 %
Lowest in the group35.1 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members135
With majority line 95.9 % — S&D median 95.8 %, 135 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 135 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Dan NICA95.9 %
S&D median95.8 %
Lowest in the group83.7 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members135
  • 2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 8 to recital AJ 221 for, 426 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI 218 for, 419 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital AC — part 2 442 for, 178 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Separate vote on recital U 419 for, 226 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 6 to recital Q 236 for, 425 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital G — part 2 438 for, 182 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 244 for, 410 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 222 for, 429 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 431 for, 223 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 15 — part 2 253 for, 165 against, 214 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 234 for, 423 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 11 — part 2 455 for, 211 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 224 for, 404 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 1 150 for, 474 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 415 for, 105 against, 142 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 128 against, 104 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Separate vote on paragraph 41 336 for, 288 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 201 for, 462 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 426 for, 140 against, 107 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 202 for, 461 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 2 to recital A 191 for, 467 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 22 462 for, 128 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 160 for, 464 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 21 510 for, 148 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 463 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 465 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 20 480 for, 152 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 145 for, 519 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 79 for, 557 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 453 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 440 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver Final vote — text as a wholePassed 602 for, 47 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 563 for, 44 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 560 for, 75 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 423 for, 57 against, 174 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Proposal to vote on amendments 135 for, 468 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 151 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to vote on amendments 120 for, 509 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East 336 for, 86 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI 244 for, 179 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 12 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) to recital F 243 for, 211 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 10, adding text after recital E 87 for, 353 against, 32 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 164 for, 288 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 300 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 167 for, 294 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 3 313 for, 94 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 2 303 for, 165 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 1 323 for, 97 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 18 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania96 % of 2 663 shared93 %
Andi CRISTEA S&DRomania96 % of 3 170 shared93 %
Claudiu MANDA S&DRomania96 % of 1 533 shared93 %
Vasile DÎNCU S&DRomania96 % of 3 501 shared93 %
Ştefan MUŞOIU S&DRomania96 % of 3 017 shared93 %
Victor NEGRESCU S&DRomania95 % of 3 136 shared93 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal95 % of 3 281 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania95 % of 3 359 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain95 % of 3 497 shared93 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal95 % of 3 338 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly93 % of 1 312 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg91 % of 3 263 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia91 % of 3 356 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance91 % of 3 541 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania91 % of 3 379 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia91 % of 3 397 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia91 % of 3 318 shared86 %
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance90 % of 3 209 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance90 % of 3 270 shared86 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance90 % of 1 771 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationVice-chair4 Feb 2025now
Delegation for relations with South AfricaD-ZA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationMember19 Sept 20243 Feb 2025

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationITRE28 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationITRE11 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationITRE8 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activitiesRapporteurITRE12 Nov 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationITRE4 Nov 2025
47th EU-Israel Inter-Parliamentary MeetingOfficial delegationD-IL20 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationITRE27 Aug 2025
No dossier namedDelegation vice-chairD-IL4 Feb 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurITRE17 Jan 2025
No dossier namedDelegation vice-chairD-IL24 Sept 2024

Show all 12 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

31 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 45 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
7 Jul 2026Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 May 2026High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the Cybersecurity Act (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (continuation of debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Dec 2025Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 2 minRead
25 Nov 2025Effective use of the EU trade and industrial policy to tackle China’s export restrictions (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Show all 31 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 4

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0309Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
21 May 2025High energy prices and the functioning of EU energy markets E-10-2025-002040Written questionwith 13 co-authors2 Sept 2025
4 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration B-10-2024-0085Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—
17 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors—

Show all 4 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 17

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
5 Jun 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898 ITRE12
27 May 2026Amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001, (EU) 2019/944, (EU) 2024/1788 as regards acceleration of permit-granting procedures ITRE-AM-788845 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788905 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE5
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788895 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788897 ITRE2
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788899 ITRE3
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788900 ITRE4
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902 ITRE9
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788849 ITRE2

Show all 17 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dan NICA”. Member record. memberId 124784. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124784?page=18&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124784. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124784?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-124784,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dan NICA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124784?page=18&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124784?page=18&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124784. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124784. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}