Skip to content

Member

Terry REINTKE

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.5 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
98.9 %ⓘ of 5 485 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
25 of 5 397 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
103381
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.5 %

5 485 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (+0.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.9 %

5 426 of 5 485 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (+1.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.5 %

25 of 5 397 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.2 %

229 of 5 485 votes cast

Participation 92.5 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Terry REINTKE92.5 %
Greens median92.2 %
Lowest in the group48.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members54
With majority line 98.9 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Terry REINTKE98.9 %
Greens median97.1 %
Lowest in the group87.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 263 for, 108 against, 222 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2 192 for, 374 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Separate vote on paragraph 2 266 for, 304 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Final votePassed 436 for, 149 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Euratom Research and Training Programme for the period 2026-2027 complementing Horizon Europe Final votePassed 489 for, 55 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 6 to Article 1, point 2 Règlement (UE) nº 575/2013 Article 510, paragraph paragraph 7 et 8 259 for, 288 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 1 115 for, 442 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Final votePassed 374 for, 176 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 177 for, 400 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 181 for, 396 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 3 180 for, 367 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Final votePassed 411 for, 100 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 3, adding text after recital 11 164 for, 358 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 4, adding text after recital 10 217 for, 348 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 176 for, 380 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 5, adding text after recital 5 185 for, 362 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 6 to Article 2, après le paragraph 2 172 for, 376 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Final votePassed 564 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 9, adding text after recital 29 171 for, 414 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 172 for, 405 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 14, adding text after recital 27 111 for, 428 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 13, adding text after recital 27 114 for, 424 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 30, adding text after recital 1 195 for, 387 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 29, adding text after recital 1 189 for, 388 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 19, adding text after recital 1 164 for, 407 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 171 for, 407 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 17, adding text after recital 1 169 for, 415 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 27 to Annex II, point 1 Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex VII, point 1 176 for, 411 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 12 to Annex I, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex IV, point 4.1, fourth sentence 163 for, 418 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 31 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 187 for, 387 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 26 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 151 for, 421 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 25 to Article 1, alinéa 1, après le point 24 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 après l'article 32 158 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 15 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 23 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 30, paragraph 2 103 for, 438 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendments 7 + 11 (voted as one) to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 21, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 26, après le paragraph 1 105 for, 462 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 10 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 16, sous-point b Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 22, paragraph 2, point b 159 for, 411 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Request by The Left Group 102 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Request by the PfE Group 132 for, 334 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 306 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 6, adding text after recital E 172 for, 288 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 146 for, 311 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 164 for, 276 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 2 375 for, 92 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 1 444 for, 32 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 100 for, 306 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 86 for, 345 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 168 for, 312 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 281 for, 193 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 67 for, 378 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 137 for, 326 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 127 for, 321 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243634
25 Nov 202421
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243331
19 Dec 20244545
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202510
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254544
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 2025106
13 Feb 2025300
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202590
12 Mar 20252280
13 Mar 2025240
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251245
3 Apr 20256259
5 May 202550
6 May 2025100
7 May 2025220220
8 May 2025103101
21 May 202522
22 May 20255352
16 Jun 202521
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259191
19 Jun 20258785
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255554
9 Jul 2025134134
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256962
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251312
22 Oct 2025186180
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267267
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257574
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125124
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256664
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266762
21 Jan 2026112106
22 Jan 20265855
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263836
11 Feb 2026139
12 Feb 2026141136
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197192
11 Mar 20266057
12 Mar 20263433
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266967
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225223
29 Apr 2026296295
30 Apr 20266865
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269690
21 May 20269892
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127120
18 Jun 20267776
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267271
8 Jul 2026144141
9 Jul 20266759
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155152
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 2026124119

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany99 % of 5 052 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 457 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany99 % of 5 473 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany99 % of 5 369 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 4 639 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany99 % of 5 222 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany99 % of 4 894 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 352 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 795 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 886 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 339 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 617 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 469 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 984 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 905 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 40 on behalf of their group; 98 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 3

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Terry REINTKE”. Member record. memberId 103381. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=87&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/103381?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-103381,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=87&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=87&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 103381. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}