Skip to content

Decision

Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office

Effect
Adopted
Result
441 for · 178 against · 34 abstained roll call
Date
18 December 2024, 12:15–12:16
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Votes
7 votes · 7 roll calls · 6 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
171271
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 441 for, 178 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (6 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 25Against 10Abst. 7No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 166Against 2Abst. 0No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 1Against 43Abst. 27No vote 9 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 10 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 3 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 2

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria137000.47
Belgium124240.50
Bulgaria104030.57
Cyprus3300—
Czechia515010.63
Germany6521190.62
Denmark132000.80
Estonia5101—
Spain4111080.68
Finland121020.88
France4434030.35
Greece96330.25
Croatia101010.86
Hungary59070.46
Ireland130100.89
Italy3862390.35
Lithuania91010.85
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia3312—
Malta5001—
Netherlands236110.65
Poland2524040.27
Portugal163110.70
Romania245130.70
Sweden173010.78
Slovenia9000—
Slovakia77010.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches118 Dec 2024 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 7

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point d B10-0216/2024 – § 1, after point d – Am 2 Roll call101 for, 533 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
2Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point d B10-0216/2024 – § 1, after point d – Am 3 Roll call106 for, 530 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
3Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point d B10-0216/2024 – § 1, after point d – Am 4 Roll call182 for, 453 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
Show the other 6 votesShow the other 4 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point d B10-0216/2024 – § 1, after point d – Am 3 Roll call106 for, 530 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
3Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point d B10-0216/2024 – § 1, after point d – Am 4 Roll call182 for, 453 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point d B10-0216/2024 – § 1, after point d – Am 5 Roll call206 for, 383 against, 56 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
5Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point f B10-0216/2024 – § 1, point f – Am 6 Roll call177 for, 457 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
6Amendment 1 to recital A B10-0216/2024 – recital A – Am 1 Roll call106 for, 533 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
7Final vote — text as a whole B10-0216/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call441 for, 178 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots

Roll calls requested by The Left, Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2024-0216

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament set up a special committee on the European Democracy Shield to counter foreign interference, disinformation and threats to democracy in the EU.

The committee will examine gaps in EU law and policy, and propose measures to protect democratic processes and citizens from such attacks.

It will work with other parliamentary committees and may make recommendations for future action.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament decides to set up a special committee on the European Democracy Shield for 12 months with 33 members to assess and counter foreign interference, disinformation, and hybrid threats.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2999(RSO) · Procedure type RSO

Setting up a special committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office

Parliament adopted the text on 18 December 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee (done)
  2. Committee work (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 18 December 2024 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: Hybrid warfare against EU · Running issue: Rule of law in EU · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Hybrid warfare against EU

Running issue: Rule of law in EU

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office”. Decision, 18 December 2024. votingId 171271, document B-10-2024-0216, reference 2024/2999(RSO). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-12-18/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-12-18-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-12-18/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-12-18/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 171271, document B-10-2024-0216, reference 2024/2999(RSO). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}