Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Hilde VAUTMANS
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Hilde VAUTMANS only. Show every member
Hilde VAUTMANS’s votes against the line, 42
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 72, adding text after recital B The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Against | For | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 63 — part 3 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 40 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 | For | Against | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 5 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 4 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 35 to Article 3, paragraph 4 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 39 — part 2 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund | Against | For | Renew |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures | Against | For | Renew |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | Renew |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Paragraph 24 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | Renew |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Paragraph 24 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | Renew |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines | For | Against | Renew |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 — part 3 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines | For | Against | Renew |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich | Against | For | Renew |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 2 to recital S Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace | For | Against | Renew |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | For | Against | Renew |
| 21 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 22 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Against | For | Renew |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 56 — part 2 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 56 — part 1 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 43 to paragraph 56 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Abstained | Against | Renew |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Referral back to committee Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector | Abstained | For | Renew |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 24, adding text after recital 6 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector | Abstained | Against | Renew |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 23, adding text after recital 6 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector | Abstained | Against | Renew |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 8 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector | Against | For | Renew |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 4 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector | Against | For | Renew |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 37 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 | Abstained | Against | Renew |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 29 to Article 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | For | Against | Renew |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilde VAUTMANS , Renew · Belgium | 2.5 % | 1 693 | 33 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 752 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=130100&to=2026-09-26
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Hilde VAUTMANS”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=130100&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Hilde VAUTMANS}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=130100&to=2026-09-26}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=130100&to=2026-09-26},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}