Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2026
Result
294 for · 245 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:18
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 13 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
Official label
B10-0238/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0282
Dossier
2026/2652(RSP)
Vote id
194461
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 52 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 100Abst. 0No vote 31 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 14Against 45Abst. 3No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
EPPFor 136Against 1Abst. 4No vote 44 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 55Against 3Abst. 7No vote 17 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 51Against 8Abst. 6No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 19Against 3Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 6No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain020
Finland030
France090
Greece010
Ireland030
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 567 members

No vote recorded, 152

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 152 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high riskFinal373 for, 289 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by The Left, EPP, Greensr · shared0.88 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 266 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.88 504 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 507 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 252 + 314 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.87 507 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 8, adding text after recital B Energy-intensive industriesAmendment348 for, 260 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 488 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.87 510 voters
15 Dec 2025Monday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group (epizootic) Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)Other240 for, 194 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.87 350 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 254 + 316 + 2 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment368 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.87 511 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 239 + 299 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment362 for, 276 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.87 509 voters
26 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Access to finance for SMEs and scale-upsFinal360 for, 298 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 54 %r · shared0.86 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194461
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194461, reference 2026/2652(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194461 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194461,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194461}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194461},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194461, reference 2026/2652(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}