Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 13 — part 2 to recital C

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Amendment 13 — part 2 to recital C
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
344 for · 201 against · 63 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: S&D
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – Recital C – Am 13/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0390
Dossier
2026/2797(RSP)
Vote id
196794
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “underscoring the need to recognise and classify these activities as high-risk professions in the EU;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 24Abst. 12No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
GreensFor 3Against 45Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 3Against 78Abst. 33No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
RenewFor 22Against 45Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
EPPFor 152Against 0Abst. 1No vote 31 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 2No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 61Against 5Abst. 3No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 19Against 0Abst. 6No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 6No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium003
Czechia500
Denmark100
Spain600
France2600
Greece100
Hungary700
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands050
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 608 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment371 for, 260 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 574 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.82 578 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 544 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.82 544 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 228 + 287 (voted as one) to recital 26 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment360 for, 277 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 544 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 253 + 315 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 280 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.82 547 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 544 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment326 for, 315 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.81 547 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment337 for, 311 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 550 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 1 Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in IranAmendment299 for, 244 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 480 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196794
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 13 — part 2 to recital C — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196794, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196794 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196794,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 13 — part 2 to recital C — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196794}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196794},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196794, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}