Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 14 — part 2 to paragraph 2

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Amendment 14 — part 2 to paragraph 2
Result
347 for · 202 against · 62 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: S&D
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – § 2 – Am 14/2
Vote id
196782
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and calls for these duties to be recognised and classified as high-risk occupations in the EU;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 23Abst. 12No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 3Against 46Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 5Against 78Abst. 32No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
RenewFor 21Against 46Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
EPPFor 155Against 0Abst. 1No vote 28 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 2No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 61Against 5Abst. 3No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 18Against 0Abst. 6No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 6No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2800
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands300
Poland2300
Portugal700
Romania600
Sweden301
Slovenia400
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 546 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment371 for, 260 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 575 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.82 580 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.82 547 voters
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 574 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 253 + 315 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 280 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.82 550 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment326 for, 315 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.82 549 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment337 for, 311 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 552 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 228 + 287 (voted as one) to recital 26 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment360 for, 277 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 547 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 547 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 14 — part 2 to paragraph 2 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196782, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196782 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196782,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 14 — part 2 to paragraph 2 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196782}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196782},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196782, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}