Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 63 — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 63 — part 2
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
429 for · 153 against · 69 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 72 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A), Members (B)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196611
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and SRHR”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 130Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 111Against 24Abst. 22No vote 27 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
ECRFor 9Against 60Abst. 8No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 4Against 38Abst. 35No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 8Abst. 4No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain400
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote341 for, 136 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 483 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 146 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 504 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 506 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleSplit vote403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 575 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote354 for, 143 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 496 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital M — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote379 for, 134 against, 80 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.90 541 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 5 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote435 for, 190 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 599 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 71 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote368 for, 147 against, 93 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.89 555 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote431 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.89 602 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 4 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote423 for, 200 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.89 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196611
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 63 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196611, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196611 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196611,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 63 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196611}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196611},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196611, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}