Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point v — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point v — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
354 for · 143 against · 52 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 40 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point v/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184834
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 354 for, 143 against, 52 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 0Abst. 1No vote 31 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 91Against 23Abst. 21No vote 52 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.51
ECRFor 3Against 50Abst. 9No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 7Against 36Abst. 19No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 2No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland200
France700
Greece100
Ireland300
Italy800
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 549 members

No vote recorded, 170

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 170 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleSplit vote403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 473 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 496 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital M — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote379 for, 134 against, 80 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.91 474 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote474 for, 136 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.90 497 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 72 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote365 for, 149 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 471 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 87 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote362 for, 163 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 470 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote347 for, 170 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 462 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 71 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote368 for, 147 against, 93 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.89 486 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 79 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote359 for, 167 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 474 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote465 for, 139 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.89 493 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184834
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184834, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184834 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184834,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184834}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184834},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184834, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}