Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 18 — part 1

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 18 — part 1
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
435 for · 197 against · 22 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 35 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 18/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196563
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 435 for, 197 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘compulsory,’ and ‘on SRHR,’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 132Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 122Against 34Abst. 4No vote 24 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
ECRFor 6Against 64Abst. 5No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 0Against 70Abst. 6No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 6No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany200
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France800
Greece300
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 654 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 514 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025Final310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.86 545 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2024 budget: assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budgetFinal389 for, 213 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.84 583 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote461 for, 186 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.84 605 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote468 for, 180 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.84 604 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening global health resilience in partner countriesFinal319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 463 voters
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.83 495 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote351 for, 204 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 564 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 579 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 604 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196563
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 18 — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196563, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196563 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196563,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 18 — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196563}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196563},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196563, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}