Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
390 for · 218 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:47
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 98 of 98 on the decision
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196156
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 61 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 69Against 74Abst. 12No vote 29 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ECRFor 3Against 70Abst. 2No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 33Against 37Abst. 4No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 10No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium003
Czechia500
Denmark010
Spain060
France2700
Greece001
Hungary0100
Italy060
Latvia100
Netherlands060
Poland010
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote394 for, 217 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 568 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote394 for, 227 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 575 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote378 for, 197 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 557 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 567 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on citation 14 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote310 for, 183 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.86 482 voters
19 Dec 2024Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote319 for, 183 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.86 486 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 467 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 7 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote367 for, 272 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.85 583 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.85 570 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 25 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote361 for, 218 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 568 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196156
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196156, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196156 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196156,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196156}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196156},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196156, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}