Vote · Roll call

Amendment 116, after recital 36

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote: Amendment 116, after recital 36
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result: 185 for · 480 against · 1 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 15 September 2026, 13:14

More facts (6)

Position: vote 62 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ESN
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – After recital 36 – Am 116
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196270

Position: vote 62 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ESN
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – After recital 36 – Am 116
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196270

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 0	Against 39	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 0	Against 51	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 1	Against 125	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 0	Against 72	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 0	Against 176	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ECR	For 71	Against 6	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.88
Patriots	For 74	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 27	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 12	Against 11	Abst. 1	No vote 4 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	4–0–0	6–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–2–0	0–15–0	0–14–0	0–6–0	0–30–0	no member voted	no member voted	15–0–0	1–6–0
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–20–0	0–1–0	0–22–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	0–5–0	0–13–0	0–13–0	0–5–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	10–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–9–0	0–4–0	0–17–0	0–1–0	0–9–0	22–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	16–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–2–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–7–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	4–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Belgium	0	2	0
Cyprus	0	1	0
Germany	0	2	0
Denmark	0	1	0
Spain	0	3	0
Finland	0	3	0
France	0	7	0
Greece	0	3	0
Ireland	0	3	0
Italy	0	9	0
Netherlands	0	1	0
Portugal	0	2	0
Sweden	0	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 51

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 51 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Ana Miguel PEDRO group that day: EPP · Portugal
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Andrey NOVAKOV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Anthony SMITH group that day: The Left · France
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Branislav ONDRUŠ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Christian DOLESCHAL group that day: EPP · Germany
Christine SINGER group that day: Renew · Germany
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Engin EROGLU group that day: Renew · Germany
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giorgio GORI group that day: S&D · Italy
Giuseppe LUPO group that day: S&D · Italy
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Isabella TOVAGLIERI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Jaak MADISON group that day: ECR · Estonia
Jacek OZDOBA group that day: ECR · Poland
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klára DOBREV group that day: S&D · Hungary
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Ľuboš BLAHA group that day: No group · Slovakia
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mariateresa VIVALDINI group that day: ECR · Italy
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mieke ANDRIESE group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: Renew · Italy
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sibylle BERG group that day: No group · Germany
Ton DIEPEVEEN group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 374 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	184 for, 453 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.98 592 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 375 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	181 for, 453 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.98 588 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 Discharge 2023: Agencies	Amendment	188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.98 601 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
31 Mar 2025	Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE Group	Other	118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 26 %		r · shared0.98 420 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 47 to paragraph 20, point vi Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	Amendment	199 for, 448 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.98 606 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 364 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	186 for, 457 against, 2 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.98 596 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 359 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	185 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.97 596 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendment 356 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	184 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.97 595 voters
18 Jun 2025	Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility	Amendment	188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.97 605 voters
21 May 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 12 The need to reduce work-related fatalities	Amendment	146 for, 316 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.97 442 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures New EU law · report by Mohammed Chahim 15 Sept 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 87 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 103 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 126 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 128 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196270
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 116, after recital 36 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196270, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196270 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196270,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 116, after recital 36 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196270}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196270},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196270, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}