Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 98 to recital 3

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote
Amendment 98 to recital 3
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
204 for · 451 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 56 of 72 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 3 – Am 98
Text
Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier
2025/0419(COD)
Vote id
196267
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 204 for, 451 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 128Abst. 0No vote 7 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 14Against 152Abst. 9No vote 9 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 74Against 1Abst. 2No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 6No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1400
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 672 members

No vote recorded, 45

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 45 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 600 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 419 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 586 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51 to paragraph 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 460 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 617 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment209 for, 434 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.95 605 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 583 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.95 422 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment199 for, 413 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 596 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment194 for, 408 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 575 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital M Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsAmendment204 for, 455 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 621 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 78 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment209 for, 450 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.95 664 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196267
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 98 to recital 3 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196267, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196267 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196267,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 98 to recital 3 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196267}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196267},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196267, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}