Vote · Roll call

Amendment 103 to article 1

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote: Amendment 103 to article 1
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result: 182 for · 441 against · 27 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 15 September 2026, 13:08

More facts (6)

Position: vote 14 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D, Patriots
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1 – after point e – Am 103
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196248

Position: vote 14 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: S&D, Patriots
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1 – after point e – Am 103
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196248

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 32	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 44	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.95
Greens	For 0	Against 51	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 2	Against 111	Abst. 1	No vote 21 of 135	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.96
Renew	For 0	Against 73	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 78	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 5	Against 165	Abst. 6	No vote 8 of 184	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.91
ECR	For 58	Against 3	Abst. 13	No vote 10 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.68
Patriots	For 75	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 27	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 14	Against 6	Abst. 7	No vote 1 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	4–0–0	6–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–2–0	0–15–0	0–14–0	0–7–0	0–30–0	no member voted	no member voted	15–0–0	6–2–0
Denmark	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	no member voted	0–4–0	1–18–0	0–1–0	0–22–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	1–6–0	0–5–0	0–0–1	0–13–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	28–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–1
Greece	0–3–0	no member voted	0–4–0	no member voted	0–7–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–3–0
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	0–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–0–6	no member voted	10–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–8–0	0–4–0	0–19–0	0–1–0	0–9–0	23–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–4–0	0–3–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–23–0	0–0–13	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–1–0	no member voted	1–6–0	0–2–0	0–7–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–7–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–5

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Austria	0	5	0
Belgium	0	3	0
Bulgaria	0	5	0
Cyprus	0	2	0
Czechia	0	5	0
Germany	0	30	0
Denmark	0	2	0
Estonia	0	2	0
Spain	0	22	0
Finland	0	4	0
France	5	0	0
Greece	0	7	0
Croatia	0	5	0
Hungary	0	0	6
Ireland	0	3	0
Italy	0	9	0
Lithuania	0	3	0
Luxembourg	0	2	0
Latvia	0	2	0
Malta	0	2	0
Netherlands	0	4	0
Poland	0	23	0
Portugal	0	7	0
Romania	0	8	0
Sweden	0	5	0
Slovenia	0	4	0
Slovakia	0	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam BIELAN group that day: ECR · Poland
Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Andrey NOVAKOV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Anthony SMITH group that day: The Left · France
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Aurore LALUCQ group that day: S&D · France
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Beata SZYDŁO group that day: ECR · Poland
Biljana BORZAN group that day: S&D · Croatia
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Christian DOLESCHAL group that day: EPP · Germany
Christine SINGER group that day: Renew · Germany
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Christophe CLERGEAU group that day: S&D · France
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cristian TERHEŞ group that day: ECR · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Emma RAFOWICZ group that day: S&D · France
Eric SARGIACOMO group that day: S&D · France
Estrella GALÁN group that day: The Left · Spain
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
François KALFON group that day: S&D · France
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Ilaria SALIS group that day: The Left · Italy
Irene MONTERO group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabella TOVAGLIERI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Jaak MADISON group that day: ECR · Estonia
Jacek OZDOBA group that day: ECR · Poland
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Javi LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
João OLIVEIRA group that day: The Left · Portugal
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klára DOBREV group that day: S&D · Hungary
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Marc BOTENGA group that day: The Left · Belgium
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mieke ANDRIESE group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Murielle LAURENT group that day: S&D · France
Nora MEBAREK group that day: S&D · France
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Pierre JOUVET group that day: S&D · France
Pina PICIERNO group that day: Renew · Italy
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN group that day: S&D · France
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN group that day: S&D · France
Tomislav SOKOL group that day: EPP · Croatia
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
26 Nov 2025	Amendment 5, adding text after recital 17 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders	Amendment	205 for, 449 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.95 593 voters
10 Mar 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024	Amendment	182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.95 546 voters
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 83 to recital 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Amendment	195 for, 465 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.95 649 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
11 Mar 2025	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 57 Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme	Amendment	206 for, 456 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 31 %	Requested by Members	r · shared0.95 597 voters
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	160 for, 481 against, 42 abstained Rejected	For 23 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.94 607 voters
18 Jun 2025	Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report	Amendment	194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by S&D, Members	r · shared0.94 579 voters
20 Jan 2026	Amendment 259 to recital 4 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest	Amendment	197 for, 454 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.94 598 voters
7 May 2025	Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds	Amendment	213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 32 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.94 590 voters
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 2 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III	Amendment	188 for, 443 against, 20 abstained Rejected	For 29 %	Requested by S&D, Patriots	r · shared0.94 580 voters
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 87 to Article 7, paragraph 3 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	Amendment	190 for, 459 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 28 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.94 640 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures New EU law · report by Mohammed Chahim 15 Sept 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 87 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 126 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 128 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 127 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196248
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 103 to article 1 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196248, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196248 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196248,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 103 to article 1 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196248}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196248},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196248, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}