Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 87 to article 1

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote
Amendment 87 to article 1
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
174 for · 465 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 72 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1 – after point e – Am 87
Text
Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier
2025/0419(COD)
Vote id
196247
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 174 for, 465 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 32Abst. 1No vote 10 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 3Against 114Abst. 2No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 1Against 72Abst. 0No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 4Against 172Abst. 0No vote 8 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 58Against 18Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 6No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 6Abst. 9No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus001
Czechia200
Germany620
Spain001
France010
Greece121
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania100
Slovenia100
Slovakia015

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 60

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 60 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment161 for, 463 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 599 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 83 to recital 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment195 for, 465 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 656 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment160 for, 481 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 614 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 21 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Amendment194 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 598 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 591 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment162 for, 450 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.89 631 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 5 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment155 for, 412 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 563 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.89 597 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.89 412 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 125 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment206 for, 437 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.89 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196247
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 87 to article 1 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196247, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196247 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196247,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 87 to article 1 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196247}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196247},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196247, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}