Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7 — part 4

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Vote: Amendment 7 — part 4
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result: 451 for · 197 against · 8 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 15 September 2026, 13:07

More facts (6)

Position: vote 5 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots · split vote: S&D, EPP, Patriots
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes – Am 7/4
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196240

Position: vote 5 of 72 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots · split vote: S&D, EPP, Patriots
Official label: A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes – Am 7/4
Text: Report A-10-2026-0201
Dossier: 2025/0419(COD)
Vote id: 196240

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Any temporary derogation should be strictly limited to what is necessary and proportionate to address the structural constraints of such regions, and should not create a risk of circumvention of the CBAM, including through diversion or re-export.”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 28	Against 7	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 44	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.70
Greens	For 51	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 122	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 13 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 71	Against 1	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 78	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 149	Against 27	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 184	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.77
ECR	For 20	Against 53	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.59
Patriots	For 1	Against 73	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
ESN	For 0	Against 26	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 9	Against 10	Abst. 8	No vote 1 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–4–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	0–2–0
Germany	2–0–0	15–0–0	14–0–0	7–0–0	30–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–14–0	7–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	no member voted	4–0–0	19–0–0	1–0–0	0–22–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	5–0–0	11–0–0	13–0–0	0–5–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	0–1–0	0–0–1
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–2–1
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	0–9–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	3–1–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	8–0–0	4–0–0	19–0–0	1–0–0	9–0–0	0–21–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	1–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	7–0–0	4–0–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	23–0–0	14–0–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–0–1
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	2–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	2–0–0	8–0–0	1–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–1–4

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Austria	5	0
Belgium	3	0
Bulgaria	5	0
Cyprus	2	0
Czechia	5	0
Germany	30	0
Denmark	2	0
Estonia	2	0
Spain	0	22
Finland	4	0
France	0	5
Greece	7	0
Croatia	5	0
Hungary	6	0
Ireland	3	0
Italy	9	0
Lithuania	3	0
Luxembourg	2	0
Latvia	2	0
Malta	2	0
Netherlands	4	0
Poland	23	0
Portugal	7	0
Romania	8	0
Sweden	5	0
Slovenia	4	0
Slovakia	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
András LÁSZLÓ group that day: Patriots · Hungary
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Andrey NOVAKOV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Anthony SMITH group that day: The Left · France
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Beata SZYDŁO group that day: ECR · Poland
Biljana BORZAN group that day: S&D · Croatia
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Christian DOLESCHAL group that day: EPP · Germany
Christine SINGER group that day: Renew · Germany
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Christophe CLERGEAU group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cristian TERHEŞ group that day: ECR · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Dan BARNA group that day: Renew · Romania
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Estrella GALÁN group that day: The Left · Spain
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Idoia MENDIA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ilaria SALIS group that day: The Left · Italy
Irene MONTERO group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabella TOVAGLIERI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Jaak MADISON group that day: ECR · Estonia
Jacek OZDOBA group that day: ECR · Poland
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klára DOBREV group that day: S&D · Hungary
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mieke ANDRIESE group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Nora MEBAREK group that day: S&D · France
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Pietro FIOCCHI group that day: ECR · Italy
Pina PICIERNO group that day: Renew · Italy
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Stefano CAVEDAGNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Tomislav SOKOL group that day: EPP · Croatia
Vasile DÎNCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
7 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2026 High-Level Political Forum	Final	374 for, 185 against, 74 abstained Adopted	For 59 %		r · shared0.81 584 voters
13 Mar 2025	Paragraph 5 — part 6 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights	Split vote	429 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.81 564 voters
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector	Amendment	428 for, 186 against, 29 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.81 585 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
22 May 2025	Amendment 24 to paragraph 11 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023	Amendment	378 for, 183 against, 24 abstained Adopted	For 65 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.80 529 voters
16 Sept 2026	Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Split vote	406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained Adopted	For 63 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.80 615 voters
19 Jun 2025	Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system	Split vote	396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted	For 69 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.80 518 voters
19 Dec 2024	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Final	322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted	For 61 %		r · shared0.80 481 voters
19 Dec 2024	Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	355 for, 177 against, 29 abstained Adopted	For 63 %	Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Left	r · shared0.79 507 voters
29 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Final	328 for, 199 against, 98 abstained Adopted	For 52 %		r · shared0.79 572 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.79 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures New EU law · report by Mohammed Chahim 15 Sept 2026 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 7 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 87 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 103 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 126 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 128 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026
Vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures — Amendment 127 to Article 1 Roll-call vote · 15 Sept 2026 15 Sept 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196240
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7 — part 4 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196240, reference 2025/0419(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196240 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196240,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7 — part 4 — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196240}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196240},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196240, reference 2025/0419(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}