Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 — part 3 to paragraph 6

Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines

Vote
Amendment 1 — part 3 to paragraph 6
Result
305 for · 238 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Greens, The Left · split vote: S&D, EPP, The Left, Greens
Official label
B10-0238/2026 – § 6 – Am 1/3
Vote id
194454
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 305 for, 238 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “,including a temporary suspension of EPR obligations”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 5Against 100Abst. 0No vote 30 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 11Against 48Abst. 1No vote 18 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
EPPFor 126Against 1Abst. 13No vote 45 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 5No vote 5 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece100
Croatia100
Italy1800
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1500
Romania500
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 564 members

No vote recorded, 155

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 155 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 503 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 311 + 398 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 276 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greens, S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.95 507 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 507 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 240 + 300 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 505 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 507 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 507 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 239 + 299 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment362 for, 276 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 506 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 505 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 504 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 509 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 — part 3 to paragraph 6 — Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines”. Vote, 18 June 2026. votingId 194454, reference 2026/2652(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194454 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-18-194454,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 — part 3 to paragraph 6 — Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194454}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-18/194454},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194454, reference 2026/2652(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}