Skip to content

Decision

Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines

Effect
Adopted
Result
294 for · 245 against · 28 abstained roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:15–13:18
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a small majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Climate & environmentHealth Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
25 votes · 16 roll calls · 8 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · S&D (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · EPP (1 split vote)
Final vote
194461
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a small majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (7 adopted, 1 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 4 lapsed). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D and Renew.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 100Abst. 0No vote 31 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 14Against 45Abst. 3No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
EPPFor 136Against 1Abst. 4No vote 44 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 55Against 3Abst. 7No vote 17 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 51Against 8Abst. 6No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 19Against 3Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 6No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 55

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria513020.58
Belgium59260.34
Bulgaria112040.77
Cyprus1005—
Czechia132330.58
Germany52261170.49
Denmark59010.46
Estonia1312—
Spain23251110.27
Finland29040.73
France29311200.26
Greece75180.31
Croatia4305—
Hungary131070.89
Ireland48020.50
Italy26276170.19
Lithuania2405—
Luxembourg0321—
Latvia5301—
Malta2301—
Netherlands1117210.35
Poland328580.57
Portugal810030.33
Romania1541130.63
Sweden812010.40
Slovenia4302—
Slovakia65220.19

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 567 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Sabine VERHEYEN GermanyEPPSpeeches218 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Alessandra MORETTI ItalyS&DSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Peter LIESE GermanyEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Tilly METZ LuxembourgGreensSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Tomislav SOKOL CroatiaEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 19 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Jutta PAULUS GermanyGreensSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Ondřej KNOTEK CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Susana SOLÍS PÉREZ SpainEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA SpainEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Kateřina KONEČNÁ CzechiaNo groupSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Christophe CLERGEAU FranceS&DSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECRSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Laurent CASTILLO changed group FrancePatriotsSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Anja ARNDT GermanyESNSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Ingeborg TER LAAK NetherlandsEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Oliver SCHENK GermanyEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Per CLAUSEN DenmarkThe LeftSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU RomaniaRenewSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ RomaniaNo groupSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Michele PICARO ItalyECRSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Letizia MORATTI ItalyEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPPSpeeches125 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 25

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 9 to paragraph 1 B10-0238/2026 – § 1 – Am 9 Roll call263 for, 271 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
2Separate vote on paragraph 6 Show of hands Adopted
3Separate vote on paragraph 6 Counted320 for, 239 against, 9 abstained Adopted
Show the other 24 votesShow the other 22 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on paragraph 6 Show of hands Adopted
3Separate vote on paragraph 6 Counted320 for, 239 against, 9 abstained Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 — part 3 B10-0238/2026 – § 6 – Am 1/3 Part voted on: “,including a temporary suspension of EPR obligations”Roll call305 for, 238 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left; split: S&D, EPP, The Left, Greens
5Amendment 7 to paragraph 6 B10-0238/2026 – § 6 – Am 7 Roll call298 for, 264 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
6Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Show of hands Adopted
7Amendment 8 to paragraph 8 B10-0238/2026 – § 8 – Am 8 Roll call282 for, 274 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
8Separate vote on paragraph 10 Show of hands Adopted
9Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 B10-0238/2026 – § 13 – Am 10 Roll call282 for, 276 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left; split: S&D, EPP, The Left, Greens
10Amendment 4, adding text after recital M B10-0238/2026 – After recital M – Am 4 Roll call291 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted
11Amendment 5, adding text after recital M B10-0238/2026 – After recital M – Am 5 Roll call302 for, 256 against, 11 abstained Adopted
12Amendment 6, adding text after recital Q B10-0238/2026 – After recital Q – Am 6 Roll call288 for, 263 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
13Final vote — text as a whole B10-0238/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call294 for, 245 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
14Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Show of hands Lapsed
15Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
16Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left
17Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0240/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
18Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0241/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
19Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0278/2026 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
20Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0279/2026 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
21Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0280/2026 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
22Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0281/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
23Separate vote on paragraph 15 Show of hands Lapsed
24Separate vote on paragraph 15 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
25Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens, The Left

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D · split votes by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0282

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on implementing the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive and risks to medicine supply security.

It supports the directive's environmental goals but worries that higher-than-expected costs and the polluter-pays scheme could hurt medicine availability and EU manufacturing.

MEPs ask the Commission to run an independent study by early 2027 and to suspend the extended producer responsibility rules until its findings are assessed.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

Loading the dossier…

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 8 connections: Running issue: Medicine supply security · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Medicine supply security

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines”. Decision, 18 June 2026. votingId 194461, document B-10-2026-0282, reference 2026/2652(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-18/7 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-18-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-18/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-18/7},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 194461, document B-10-2026-0282, reference 2026/2652(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}