Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital G — part 2

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote
Recital G — part 2
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2026
Result
438 for · 182 against · 50 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 29 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members (a) · split vote: Members (a)
Official label
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital G/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier
2025/2111(INI)
Vote id
194332
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 438 for, 182 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas a majority of migrants coming to Europe arrive through legal channels; whereas SDG 10 target 7 calls for countries to facilitate the orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people through planned and well-managed migration policies”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 132Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 135Against 29Abst. 4No vote 17 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
ECRFor 1Against 37Abst. 40No vote 3 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 12Abst. 6No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain050
France0290
Greece010
Hungary090
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 670 members

No vote recorded, 49

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 49 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 121 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote362 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 534 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote406 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.91 599 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 2 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote408 for, 192 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 586 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AC Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote412 for, 199 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 591 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote378 for, 244 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.86 595 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after Recital B — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment427 for, 201 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 602 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote Framework for achieving climate neutralityFinal379 for, 248 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.86 597 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital BM Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote391 for, 202 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 604 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.85 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194332
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital G — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194332, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194332 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194332,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital G — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194332}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194332},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194332, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}