Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 12, after paragraph 33

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote
Amendment 12, after paragraph 33
Result
244 for · 410 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 29 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots
Official label
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 33 – Am 12
Vote id
194326
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 244 for, 410 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 37 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 1 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 121Abst. 3No vote 8 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 44Against 119Abst. 8No vote 14 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 11Abst. 0No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Czechia100
Germany1300
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 45 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment211 for, 411 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 597 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 127 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment198 for, 361 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 532 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 558 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment200 for, 351 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 522 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, Renewr · shared0.92 600 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 360 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.91 536 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to recital K Joint communication on humanitarian aidAmendment208 for, 347 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 539 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 49 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment221 for, 407 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECR, Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.91 596 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment205 for, 350 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.91 521 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 51 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment245 for, 386 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 12, after paragraph 33 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194326, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194326 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194326,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 12, after paragraph 33 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194326}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194326},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194326, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}