Paragraph 15 — part 2 · Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 40 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “as well as by providing safer alternatives through the creation of legal channels for safe and regular migration and labour mobility; underlines that strict border control without alternative legal pathways for migration shifts migration routes, introducing different steps into the journey and new transit countries, thus increasing the precariousness of the journey and the exposure of migrants to smuggling networks, extortion and violence”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 44	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 45	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 48	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 88	Against 0	Abst. 4	No vote 44 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.93
Renew	For 59	Against 6	Abst. 3	No vote 9 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.80
EPP	For 5	Against 11	Abst. 153	No vote 16 of 185	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.86
ECR	For 1	Against 35	Abst. 42	No vote 3 of 81	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.31
Patriots	For 0	Against 74	Abst. 5	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.91
ESN	For 0	Against 24	Abst. 1	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
No group	For 8	Against 15	Abst. 6	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–4	no member voted	0–0–5	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–2	0–0–3	0–0–3	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–1	0–2–3	0–0–1	no member voted	0–3–0	1–0–1
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–5	0–3–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	0–3–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	10–0–1	9–0–0	0–0–30	no member voted	no member voted	0–12–1	5–1–1
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	2–2–0	0–1–1	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	3–0–0	10–0–1	1–0–0	0–0–20	0–0–2	0–5–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–4	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	4–0–0	12–0–0	12–0–0	1–4–0	0–4–0	0–29–0	0–1–0	0–0–1
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–0–6	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–2–1
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–0–6	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–0–5	no member voted	0–9–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	15–0–0	no member voted	0–0–8	0–0–24	0–7–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–2	0–1–1	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–2	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	0–0–2	1–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–0–2	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–1	3–4–0	0–0–4	0–0–3	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	0–0–23	0–17–1	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	5–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–7	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–1	2–0–0	0–0–7	0–2–4	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–1
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–4	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–6–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Abst.
Austria	2	0
Belgium	3	0
Bulgaria	2	0
Germany	10	1
Denmark	3	0
Estonia	2	0
Spain	10	1
Finland	2	0
France	12	0
Greece	1	0
Croatia	1	0
Hungary	2	0
Italy	15	0
Lithuania	1	0
Luxembourg	1	0
Malta	3	0
Netherlands	3	1
Poland	3	0
Portugal	5	0
Romania	1	1
Sweden	5	0
Slovenia	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Andreas SCHIEDER group that day: S&D · Austria
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Aurore LALUCQ group that day: S&D · France
Bas EICKHOUT group that day: Greens · Netherlands
Biljana BORZAN group that day: S&D · Croatia
Birgit SIPPEL group that day: S&D · Germany
Branko GRIMS group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Carla TAVARES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Cecilia STRADA group that day: S&D · Italy
César LUENA group that day: S&D · Spain
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Costas MAVRIDES group that day: S&D · Cyprus
Cristina MAESTRE group that day: S&D · Spain
Csaba BOGDÁN group that day: EPP · Hungary
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dan NICA group that day: S&D · Romania
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU group that day: EPP · Romania
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Dragoş BENEA group that day: S&D · Romania
Elio DI RUPO group that day: S&D · Belgium
Elisabeth GROSSMANN group that day: S&D · Austria
Elisabetta GUALMINI group that day: Renew · Italy
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS group that day: EPP · Greece
Eugen TOMAC group that day: Renew · Romania
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Francisco ASSIS group that day: S&D · Portugal
Friedrich PÜRNER group that day: No group · Germany
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Gerald HAUSER group that day: Patriots · Austria
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Gheorghe FALCĂ group that day: EPP · Romania
Günther SIDL group that day: S&D · Austria
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Idoia MENDIA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN group that day: EPP · Romania
Irena JOVEVA group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
José CEPEDA group that day: S&D · Spain
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Lina GÁLVEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marco TARQUINIO group that day: S&D · Italy
Marcos ROS SEMPERE group that day: S&D · Spain
Maria GRAPINI group that day: S&D · Romania
Marko VEŠLIGAJ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Matteo RICCI group that day: S&D · Italy
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mihai TUDOSE group that day: S&D · Romania
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR group that day: S&D · Spain
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Nicola ZINGARETTI group that day: S&D · Italy
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE group that day: EPP · Spain
Nikolas FARANTOURIS group that day: S&D · Greece
Nikos PAPANDREOU group that day: S&D · Greece
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Norbert HERHAMMER group that day: EPP · Germany
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Pina PICIERNO group that day: S&D · Italy
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
René REPASI group that day: S&D · Germany
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana JERKOVIĆ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Rosa SERRANO SIERRA group that day: S&D · Spain
Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU group that day: S&D · Greece
Sophia KIRCHER group that day: EPP · Austria
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Ştefan MUŞOIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Udo BULLMANN group that day: S&D · Germany
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS group that day: S&D · Lithuania
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ group that day: EPP · Slovenia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.83 538 voters
21 May 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 53 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Separate vote	248 for, 158 against, 114 abstained Adopted	For 48 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.82 472 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.82 540 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Jun 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Final	282 for, 340 against, 26 abstained Rejected	For 44 %		r · shared0.82 563 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.82 525 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.82 545 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.82 533 voters
29 Apr 2026	Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained Rejected	For 45 %	Requested by EPP	r · shared0.82 549 voters
17 Jun 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Separate vote	278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 42 %	Requested by S&D, Renew	r · shared0.82 574 voters
17 Jun 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 2 Electoral rights of mobile Union citizens in European Parliament elections	Separate vote	306 for, 158 against, 202 abstained Adopted	For 46 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.81 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Resolution · report by Lukas Mandl 16 Jun 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Paragraph 11 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Recital G — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Amendment 6 to recital Q Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026
Vote Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries — Separate vote on recital U Roll-call vote · 16 Jun 2026 16 Jun 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194316
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 15 — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194316, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194316 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194316,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 15 — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194316}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194316},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194316, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}