Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 11 — part 2

Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries

Vote
Paragraph 11 — part 2
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2026
Result
455 for · 211 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 29 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members (a) · split vote: Members (a)
Official label
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 11/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0147
Dossier
2025/2111(INI)
Vote id
194312
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 455 for, 211 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 130Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 2No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 155Against 16Abst. 0No vote 14 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 13Against 13Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain050
France0290
Greece010
Hungary090
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland030
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 673 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 543 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 592 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.94 607 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote444 for, 195 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.94 600 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote423 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 593 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 3 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 169 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 570 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital BC — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote427 for, 195 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 593 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194312
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 11 — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 194312, reference 2025/2111(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194312 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-194312,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 11 — part 2 — Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194312}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/194312},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 194312, reference 2025/2111(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}