Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 21

European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 21
Result
510 for · 148 against · 13 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 21
Vote id
193865
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 510 for, 148 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 76 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 3Abst. 3No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 130Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 64Against 4Abst. 0No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 163Against 3Abst. 4No vote 15 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 60Against 15Abst. 3No vote 3 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
PatriotsFor 3Against 76Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 6Against 21Abst. 2No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1910
Finland200
France1300
Greece400
Croatia400
Hungary200
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal700
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.89 607 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.87 610 voters
26 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesFinal519 for, 99 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.86 620 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 603 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.85 597 voters
8 Jul 2025Recital I — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 617 voters
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 32 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSeparate vote483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 584 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 615 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal495 for, 130 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 634 voters
3 Apr 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus - threats from the Investigative CommitteeSplit vote477 for, 113 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 21 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 193865, reference 2026/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193865 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-193865,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 21 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193865}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193865},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193865, reference 2026/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}