Decision

European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded

Effect: Adopted
Result: 426 for · 140 against · 107 abstained roll call
Date: 16 June 2026, 13:40–13:43
Kind: Resolution

More facts (9)

Margin: by a large majority
Text: Report A-10-2026-0145
Dossier: 2026/2013(INI)
Source: Committee report by Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens
Topics: EU institutions & Parliament Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 18 votes · 13 roll calls · 9 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Sitting: Tuesday 16 June 2026
Final vote: 193542

Margin: by a large majority
Text: Report A-10-2026-0145
Dossier: 2026/2013(INI)
Source: Committee report by Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens
Topics: EU institutions & Parliament Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 18 votes · 13 roll calls · 9 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Sitting: Tuesday 16 June 2026
Final vote: 193542

Cite this page Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (9 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted, 5 rejected).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by Patriots and ESN; The Left and ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 7	Against 1	Abst. 36	No vote 1 of 45	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.73
Greens	For 48	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 131	Against 1	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 68	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 9 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 166	Against 2	Abst. 2	No vote 15 of 185	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.96
ECR	For 2	Against 16	Abst. 60	No vote 3 of 81	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.65
Patriots	For 0	Against 79	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 0	Against 25	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 4	Against 16	Abst. 9	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 31

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

The Left line Abstained · 8 voted for or against of 44 who voted
Voted for or against (8)
- Catarina MARTINS Portugal
- Ilaria SALIS Italy
- João OLIVEIRA Portugal
- Jussi SARAMO Finland
- Li ANDERSSON Finland
- Merja KYLLÖNEN Finland
- Mimmo LUCANO Italy
- Younous OMARJEE France
S&D line For · 1 voted against of 132 who voted
Voted against (1)
- Christophe CLERGEAU France
EPP line For · 2 voted against, 2 abstained of 170 who voted
Voted against (2)
- Christian DOLESCHAL Germany
- Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL Portugal
Abstained (2)
- Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE Sweden
- Henrik DAHL Denmark
ECR line Abstained · 18 voted for or against of 78 who voted
Voted for or against (18)
- Beatrice TIMGREN Sweden
- Bert-Jan RUISSEN Netherlands
- Charlie WEIMERS Sweden
- Cristian TERHEŞ Romania
- Dick ERIXON Sweden
- Diego SOLIER Spain
- Emmanouil FRAGKOS Greece
- Guillaume PELTIER France
- Jaak MADISON Estonia
- Jessika VAN LEEUWEN Netherlands
- Kristoffer STORM Denmark
- Laurence TROCHU France
- Marion MARÉCHAL France
- Nicolas BAY France
- Nora JUNCO GARCÍA Spain
- Sander SMIT Netherlands
- Sebastian TYNKKYNEN Finland
- Stephen Nikola BARTULICA Croatia

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)

Members' votes by country. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Cohesion
Austria	12	5	0	3	0.56
Belgium	13	3	5	1	0.43
Bulgaria	12	3	1	1	0.63
Cyprus	4	0	2	0	—
Czechia	6	10	4	1	0.25
Germany	67	14	10	5	0.60
Denmark	11	2	2	0	0.60
Estonia	5	1	0	1	—
Spain	45	6	4	5	0.73
Finland	13	1	0	1	0.89
France	34	36	7	4	0.20
Greece	11	5	4	1	0.33
Croatia	11	1	0	0	0.88
Hungary	8	10	0	3	0.33
Ireland	9	0	3	2	0.63
Italy	33	8	32	3	0.18
Lithuania	7	1	2	1	0.55
Luxembourg	5	0	1	0	—
Latvia	5	1	3	0	—
Malta	5	0	0	1	—
Netherlands	20	9	1	1	0.50
Poland	27	6	18	2	0.29
Portugal	16	4	0	1	0.70
Romania	20	3	5	5	0.57
Sweden	15	3	3	0	0.57
Slovenia	6	0	0	3	—
Slovakia	6	8	0	1	0.36

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 673 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. **Speeches**: how many times they took the floor. **Final vote**: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
Member	Group	Speeches	Spoke	Final vote
Roberta METSOLA Malta	EPP	Speeches1	16 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	No vote recorded
Charles GOERENS Luxembourg	Renew	Speeches1	16 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	For
Loránt VINCZE Romania	EPP	Speeches1	16 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	For

All votes on this decision, 18

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
1	Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 10	Roll call	211 for, 440 against, 2 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
2	Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 11	Roll call	211 for, 453 against, 2 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
3	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 5 – Am 1	Roll call	79 for, 557 against, 26 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left

Show the other 17 votesShow the other 15 votes

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
2	Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 11	Roll call	211 for, 453 against, 2 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
3	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 5 – Am 1	Roll call	79 for, 557 against, 26 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
4	Separate vote on paragraph 6	Show of hands	Rejected
5	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 16	Show of hands	Rejected
6	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 16	Show of hands	Rejected
7	Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 20 – Am 14	Roll call	145 for, 519 against, 7 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
8	Separate vote on paragraph 20 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 20	Roll call	480 for, 152 against, 34 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Patriots
9	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 20 – Am 5	Roll call	202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
10	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
11	Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 20 – Am 7	Roll call	202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
12	Separate vote on paragraph 21 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 21	Roll call	510 for, 148 against, 13 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Patriots
13	Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 22 – Am 8	Roll call	160 for, 464 against, 46 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
14	Separate vote on paragraph 22 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 22	Roll call	462 for, 128 against, 82 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Patriots
15	Separate vote on recital A	Show of hands	Rejected
16	Amendment 2 to recital A A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – Recital A – Am 2	Roll call	191 for, 467 against, 13 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
17	Amendment 3, adding text after recital A A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After recital A – Am 3	Roll call	202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ESN
18	Final vote — text as a whole A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)	Roll call	426 for, 140 against, 107 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0145

What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its annual report on the application of the regulation on European political parties and foundations, assessing the first months of the new rules.

The text highlights the strategic role of European political foundations and calls for a review of their funding provisions, which are deemed insufficient for their growing tasks.

MEPs ask the Commission to consider a legislative proposal to revise the funding rules, ensuring adequate resources while maintaining transparency and accountability.

Read the text · Report a problem

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution assesses the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 on European political parties and foundations, focusing on funding issues for foundations.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2013(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 16 June 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier

Referred to committee · 12 February 2026 (done)
Committee work · Report adopted 5 May 2026 (done)
Tabled for plenary · 12 May 2026 (done)
Plenary vote · Adopted 16 June 2026 (done)
Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: AFCO · Authors: Loránt VINCZE (EPP), Charles GOERENS (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Decision Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) New EU law · report by Jens Gieseke 21 May 2026 Negotiating mandate approved
Decision Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Resolution · report by Hannah Neumann 16 Jun 2026 Adopted
Decision Competition policy – annual report 2024 Resolution · report by Lara Wolters 8 May 2025 Adopted
Decision 2022 discharge: EU general budget – European Council and Council Budget decision · report by Jonas Sjöstedt 22 Oct 2024 Passed
Decision Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 Resolution · report by Francisco Assis 21 Jan 2026 Adopted

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/9
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded”. Decision, 16 June 2026. votingId 193542, document A-10-2026-0145, reference 2026/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/9 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-16-9,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/9}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/9},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193542, document A-10-2026-0145, reference 2026/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}