Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after paragraph 5

European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded

Vote
Amendment 1, after paragraph 5
Result
79 for · 557 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 5 – Am 1
Vote id
193860
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 79 for, 557 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 10Against 37Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
S&DFor 17Against 92Abst. 19No vote 8 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
RenewFor 1Against 62Abst. 1No vote 13 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 1Against 167Abst. 3No vote 14 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 1Against 76Abst. 0No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 20Abst. 2No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus001
Czechia030
Germany250
Spain010
France100
Greece310
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia141

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 662 members

No vote recorded, 57

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 57 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment70 for, 476 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 507 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment98 for, 508 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 609 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment103 for, 470 against, 83 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment74 for, 478 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 515 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment80 for, 529 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 605 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 174 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment65 for, 568 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 589 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 21 to paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment75 for, 526 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 602 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 601 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 44 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment69 for, 529 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 583 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 601 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1, after paragraph 5 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 193860, reference 2026/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193860 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-193860,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after paragraph 5 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193860}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193860},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193860, reference 2026/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}