Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 11, after paragraph 4

European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded

Vote
Amendment 11, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2026
Result
211 for · 453 against · 2 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 11
Text
Report A-10-2026-0145
Dossier
2026/2013(INI)
Vote id
193859
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 211 for, 453 against, 2 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 41Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 132Abst. 0No vote 4 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 10 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 10Against 160Abst. 0No vote 15 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 22Against 5Abst. 2No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland100
France400
Greece100
Croatia100
Italy2400
Lithuania200
Latvia300
Netherlands300
Poland1800
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

No vote recorded, 53

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 53 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 568 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 560 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 564 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 580 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 562 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 580 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 425 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 567 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 577 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 563 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 51 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment207 for, 421 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.97 581 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193859
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 11, after paragraph 4 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 193859, reference 2026/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193859 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-193859,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 11, after paragraph 4 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193859}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193859},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193859, reference 2026/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}