Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10, after paragraph 4

European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded

Vote
Amendment 10, after paragraph 4
Result
211 for · 440 against · 2 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 10
Vote id
193858
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 211 for, 440 against, 2 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 127Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 4Against 59Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 9Against 159Abst. 0No vote 17 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 22Against 6Abst. 1No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain500
France2900
Greece100
Hungary900
Italy700
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 70 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment206 for, 431 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.99 574 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 572 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment199 for, 372 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 528 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment208 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 601 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 135, adding text after paragraph 49 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment209 for, 429 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.98 581 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 590 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 601 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 56 to paragraph 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment211 for, 443 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment217 for, 433 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.97 601 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.97 568 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 10, after paragraph 4 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded”. Vote, 16 June 2026. votingId 193858, reference 2026/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193858 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-06-16-193858,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10, after paragraph 4 — European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193858}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-06-16/193858},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193858, reference 2026/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}