Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29 to paragraph 8

The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward

Vote
Amendment 29 to paragraph 8
Result
191 for · 371 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 54 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 8 – Am 29D
Vote id
193033
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 191 for, 371 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 106Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 20Against 110Abst. 5No vote 48 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
ECRFor 63Against 3Abst. 0No vote 15 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 1Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 9Against 9Abst. 1No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Germany1500
France100
Hungary010
Italy100
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 570 members

No vote recorded, 147

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 147 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 509 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 91 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment214 for, 408 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 511 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 95 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment216 for, 412 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 516 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 470 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment218 for, 419 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 535 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 505 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 360 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.93 479 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 495 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 476 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 50 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment220 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.93 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193033, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193033 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193033,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 — The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193033}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193033},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193033, reference 2024/2127(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}