Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 19 — part 2

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Paragraph 19 — part 2
Result
463 for · 151 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – § 19/2
Vote id
193006
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 463 for, 151 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “reiterates the importance of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence without delay and of bringing the legal definition of rape in line with international human rights standards;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 140Against 10Abst. 5No vote 28 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 4Against 68Abst. 3No vote 6 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 27Against 39Abst. 12No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 8Against 11Abst. 5No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria220
Czechia500
Germany2700
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain1800
Finland400
France300
Greece700
Croatia320
Hungary003
Ireland400
Italy520
Lithuania200
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands400
Poland2001
Portugal601
Romania710
Sweden400
Slovenia320
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 584 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 574 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 506 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote456 for, 144 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 582 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 515 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 57 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote405 for, 176 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 579 voters
17 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on MontenegroSeparate vote454 for, 143 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 589 voters
17 Jun 2025Amendment 29 — part 4 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)Amendment435 for, 153 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 576 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 78 — part 3 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote452 for, 142 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.86 568 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 596 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 19 — part 2 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193006, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193006,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 19 — part 2 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193006, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}