Paragraph 19 — part 2 · Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “reiterates the importance of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence without delay and of bringing the legal definition of rape in line with international human rights standards;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 43	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 45	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 49	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 121	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 15 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 71	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 77	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 140	Against 10	Abst. 5	No vote 28 of 183	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.85
ECR	For 4	Against 68	Abst. 3	No vote 6 of 81	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.86
Patriots	For 27	Against 39	Abst. 12	No vote 7 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.25
ESN	For 0	Against 23	Abst. 3	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.83
No group	For 8	Against 11	Abst. 5	No vote 6 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted
Cyprus	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	1–2–0	0–8–0	0–1–0	0–3–0
Germany	4–0–0	15–0–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	27–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–2	5–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	4–0–0	2–0–0	16–0–0	1–0–0	18–0–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	9–0–0	4–0–0	10–0–0	13–0–0	3–0–0	0–4–0	26–0–0	0–0–1	1–0–0
Greece	2–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–3
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	3–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–0–3	no member voted	0–9–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	3–0–0	20–0–0	1–0–0	5–2–0	0–21–0	0–0–6	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	7–0–0	4–0–0	0–3–0	0–1–5	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–1	0–20–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	2–0–0	6–0–1	no member voted	0–1–1	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	9–0–0	3–0–0	7–1–0	1–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–0–2	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	3–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–1

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Czechia	0	3	0
Germany	5	0	1
Spain	0	1	0
France	1	0	0
Greece	1	0	3
Luxembourg	1	0	0
Poland	0	1	0
Romania	0	1	0
Slovakia	0	5	1

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Alex AGIUS SALIBA group that day: S&D · Malta
Alexandre VARAUT group that day: Patriots · France
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE group that day: EPP · Sweden
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Andrey NOVAKOV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Anna STÜRGKH group that day: Renew · Austria
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE group that day: EPP · Spain
Aurore LALUCQ group that day: S&D · France
Charlie WEIMERS group that day: ECR · Sweden
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Christian EHLER group that day: EPP · Germany
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Christophe CLERGEAU group that day: S&D · France
Christophe GOMART group that day: EPP · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Elena KOUNTOURA group that day: The Left · Greece
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Fabrice LEGGERI group that day: Patriots · France
Fidias PANAYIOTOU group that day: No group · Cyprus
Francisco José MILLÁN MON group that day: EPP · Spain
François-Xavier BELLAMY group that day: EPP · France
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Gheorghe FALCĂ group that day: EPP · Romania
Giorgos GEORGIOU group that day: The Left · Cyprus
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hildegard BENTELE group that day: EPP · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Jana TOOM group that day: Renew · Estonia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Javi LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR group that day: S&D · Spain
Karlo RESSLER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Kinga KOLLÁR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Kristian VIGENIN group that day: S&D · Bulgaria
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Leoluca ORLANDO group that day: Greens · Italy
Letizia MORATTI group that day: EPP · Italy
Loucas FOURLAS group that day: EPP · Cyprus
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marcos ROS SEMPERE group that day: S&D · Spain
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Marjan ŠAREC group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Marko VEŠLIGAJ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG group that day: No group · Germany
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Michalis HADJIPANTELA group that day: EPP · Cyprus
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Pál SZEKERES group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Pascale PIERA group that day: Patriots · France
Peter AGIUS group that day: EPP · Malta
Pietro FIOCCHI group that day: ECR · Italy
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA group that day: EPP · Spain
Rada LAYKOVA group that day: ESN · Bulgaria
Raffaele STANCANELLI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Riho TERRAS group that day: EPP · Estonia
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN group that day: ECR · Finland
Stefan BERGER group that day: EPP · Germany
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Taner KABILOV group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Thomas BAJADA group that day: S&D · Malta
Thomas GEISEL group that day: No group · Germany
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Yannis MANIATIS group that day: S&D · Greece

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality	Amendment	489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 76 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.90 584 voters
9 Sept 2025	Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurement	Split vote	481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted	For 75 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.89 574 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted	For 73 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.89 506 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
8 Jul 2026	Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Split vote	456 for, 144 against, 40 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.88 582 voters
12 Feb 2026	Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women	Split vote	373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.87 515 voters
29 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 57 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Separate vote	405 for, 176 against, 49 abstained Adopted	For 64 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.87 579 voters
17 Jun 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Montenegro	Separate vote	454 for, 143 against, 56 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.87 589 voters
17 Jun 2025	Amendment 29 — part 4 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)	Amendment	435 for, 153 against, 60 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.86 576 voters
23 Oct 2024	Paragraph 78 — part 3 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections	Split vote	452 for, 142 against, 49 abstained Adopted	For 70 %		r · shared0.86 568 voters
28 Apr 2026	Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Split vote	491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted	For 75 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.86 596 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Resolution · motion for a resolution 20 May 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Separate vote on paragraph 2 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Separate vote on paragraph 6 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Paragraph 11 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Paragraph 15 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026
Vote Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response — Paragraph 19 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 20 May 2026 20 May 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 19 — part 2 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193006, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193006,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 19 — part 2 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193006},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193006, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}