Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6 to paragraph 69

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Vote
Amendment 6 to paragraph 69
Result
188 for · 449 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 8 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 69 – Am 6
Vote id
192738
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 121Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 157Abst. 0No vote 26 of 183Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 4No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia300
Germany016
Spain100
France010
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Romania100
Slovakia321

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.99 646 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment179 for, 405 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 537 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 27 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment187 for, 451 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 610 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 609 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 262 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.98 581 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 544 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 12 to recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment178 for, 411 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 542 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 433 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 551 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 192738, reference 2024/2126(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192738 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-192738,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 — The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192738}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/192738},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192738, reference 2024/2126(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}